xRisingForce
05-17-2008, 02:13 AM
A better title for this thread is: "On the Correlation Between an Instrument's Structure to Pitch."
I saw this picture of a million fret guitar today:
http://music.geocities.jp/tjmthtr/gazo/PAP_0180.JPG
Then I started wondering whether such a concept was plausible.
From convention, the 24 fret hallmark of Jackson and and Dean guitars is realizable through a structural hallmark: the cutaway. What this translates to is in achieving this, the neck isn't augmented in length in moving away from the body, but rather towards it. I'm pretty sure that the distance from the tuning pegs to the bridge is key and consequently reflective of a few things:
1. The distance from the tuning peg to the nut (the white vertical structure directly below the head) along with the distance from the nut to the bridge relates to the length of the neck.
2. A difference in 1 accounts for differences in the distances from fret to fret of two guitars.
3. That differences in fret distance between guitars in general isn't very pronounced accounts for the fact that the respective lengths from tuning peg to bridge of all guitars are very similar.
3. The distance between the consecutive frets is inversely related to an increase in pitch.
4. An increase in tuning-peg-to-bridge length doesn't correlate at all to an increase in range of notes.
String tension in playing an open string on this guitar would be the same as on my 21 fret strat. However, the distance in pitch between the the representive notes of the first and second frets of this guitar is not at all equivocal to my guitar.
Any ideas if something like this could cross over to other instruments as well?
I saw this picture of a million fret guitar today:
http://music.geocities.jp/tjmthtr/gazo/PAP_0180.JPG
Then I started wondering whether such a concept was plausible.
From convention, the 24 fret hallmark of Jackson and and Dean guitars is realizable through a structural hallmark: the cutaway. What this translates to is in achieving this, the neck isn't augmented in length in moving away from the body, but rather towards it. I'm pretty sure that the distance from the tuning pegs to the bridge is key and consequently reflective of a few things:
1. The distance from the tuning peg to the nut (the white vertical structure directly below the head) along with the distance from the nut to the bridge relates to the length of the neck.
2. A difference in 1 accounts for differences in the distances from fret to fret of two guitars.
3. That differences in fret distance between guitars in general isn't very pronounced accounts for the fact that the respective lengths from tuning peg to bridge of all guitars are very similar.
3. The distance between the consecutive frets is inversely related to an increase in pitch.
4. An increase in tuning-peg-to-bridge length doesn't correlate at all to an increase in range of notes.
String tension in playing an open string on this guitar would be the same as on my 21 fret strat. However, the distance in pitch between the the representive notes of the first and second frets of this guitar is not at all equivocal to my guitar.
Any ideas if something like this could cross over to other instruments as well?