zircon
06-22-2008, 05:27 AM
I picked up a new Q9450 at Micro Center the other day and had it installed by them. After some BIOS trouble (had to be flashed/reset and updated) they got it in. In their air-conditioned labs, the avg. temperature per core (idle in Windows) was about 50c. Now, at home, with a hotter room (~75f ambient temperature at most) the cores are idling at 58-61c. Under load, a bit higher.
This is really worrisome. My old E6600 had idle temps of no more than 40c and 50c under load would worry me. It sometimes idled as low as 30c. My airflow here is slightly worse (vent in left side of the computer is about 4 inches from a wall, but nothing I can do about that) but otherwise the only difference is the processor. I had the tech guy use arctic silver coolant and my Zalman Icetank heatsink/cooler.
Should I be concerned? I've read that Q9450s are supposed to be quite a bit cooler than this.
EDIT: Worth noting, these temperatures were reported with the "CoreTemp" utility. "Real Temp 2.60", which I just downloaded, is reporting current temps of 49-52, which is a fairly big difference, but I don't know which one is more accurate.
This is really worrisome. My old E6600 had idle temps of no more than 40c and 50c under load would worry me. It sometimes idled as low as 30c. My airflow here is slightly worse (vent in left side of the computer is about 4 inches from a wall, but nothing I can do about that) but otherwise the only difference is the processor. I had the tech guy use arctic silver coolant and my Zalman Icetank heatsink/cooler.
Should I be concerned? I've read that Q9450s are supposed to be quite a bit cooler than this.
EDIT: Worth noting, these temperatures were reported with the "CoreTemp" utility. "Real Temp 2.60", which I just downloaded, is reporting current temps of 49-52, which is a fairly big difference, but I don't know which one is more accurate.