Liontamer
10-06-2008, 05:57 AM
Remixer name: T.O.P
Game: Zelda 3
Song: Zelda 3 credits
I've made it on reason 4.0 and played everything on my keyboard.
------------------------------------------------------------------
http://snesmusic.org/v2/download.php?spcNow=loz3 - "Credits" (loz3-31.spc)
There's definitely clipping/distortion/buzzing/everything happening from :43-1:13. Compared to the arrangement, the production was definitely weaker, as everything sounded lossy, like all the high frequencies got lopped off. Some of the sequencing on the low strings also needed some work, as the fake-sounding note movements were really exposed from 2:32-2:55. The piano from 2:52 until the end also seemed less emotive while going for some beefed up chords; the timing felt a bit too stiff/mechanical.
Otherwise, a reasonable arrangement, helped in part by the source being so strong. It was relatively conservative in terms of the structure, but the different instrumentation, mood and performance dynamics & added piano writing helped this stand apart.
Refine the production and smooth out some of the articulation issues with the low strings and piano and this could be a winner. Arrangement-wise, there could be more going on, but I thought the substance was definitely there. Really enjoyable first sub.
NO (resubmit)
Game: Zelda 3
Song: Zelda 3 credits
I've made it on reason 4.0 and played everything on my keyboard.
------------------------------------------------------------------
http://snesmusic.org/v2/download.php?spcNow=loz3 - "Credits" (loz3-31.spc)
There's definitely clipping/distortion/buzzing/everything happening from :43-1:13. Compared to the arrangement, the production was definitely weaker, as everything sounded lossy, like all the high frequencies got lopped off. Some of the sequencing on the low strings also needed some work, as the fake-sounding note movements were really exposed from 2:32-2:55. The piano from 2:52 until the end also seemed less emotive while going for some beefed up chords; the timing felt a bit too stiff/mechanical.
Otherwise, a reasonable arrangement, helped in part by the source being so strong. It was relatively conservative in terms of the structure, but the different instrumentation, mood and performance dynamics & added piano writing helped this stand apart.
Refine the production and smooth out some of the articulation issues with the low strings and piano and this could be a winner. Arrangement-wise, there could be more going on, but I thought the substance was definitely there. Really enjoyable first sub.
NO (resubmit)