[ParanoidDrone]

If I can, I'll join, but this is the point where literally every class of mine has some sort of long term project due, so...yeah. I'll join if it's under control, but don't count on it.

EDIT:

Originally Posted by Vivi22

In other news, last night was the first chance I really had to play on server 1. Apparently my favourite weapon is now world suicide. Must have been from airblasting some people off of point E on Steel.

And my backstab counter is apparently frozen at 260. It's been at that number for the past several days.

(The irony in this is that I'm not normally a stat whore.)

[Scufo]

I'm interested in playing scrims. Don't have a mic, though...

[SporkNinjaDraken]

I'll join in on the scrim so count me in I'll just need someone else to actually remind me about it xD

[Powerlord]

I'm not sure what's going on with the mapcycle on #1 right now. I've used the sm listmaps command and the mapcycle there is correct (the contents of mapcycle_server1.txt).

I'll restart the server later to if that fixes it.

P.S. The nominate list hasn't been changed and is identical between the two servers. It also appears to be auto-sorted alphabetically now.

[Lyrai]

This is meant as an honest question, but why do..how to phrase it. Tournament Play? Serious Face? Scrim? That braket of players, what's the reasoning behind "no sandman?" I've seen it crop up all over the place but never been able to get the logic. Is it the stun? Does the stun...go against some tenet of professional play?

[Secret Agent Man]

It is, in fact, the stun. I believe it was banned initially because it could stun active UberCharges. Valve saw the error of their ways and corrected this issue later on, but I believe it can be best described like so:

Stunning + First Person Shooter = No

[Clefairy]

Originally Posted by Lyrai

This is meant as an honest question, but why do..how to phrase it. Tournament Play? Serious Face? Scrim? That braket of players, what's the reasoning behind "no sandman?" I've seen it crop up all over the place but never been able to get the logic. Is it the stun? Does the stun...go against some tenet of professional play?

It's a legacy thing. Traditionally, each individual player's skill has been the most important aspect of 'high-level' play, though that is subverted in explicitly team-focused games like TF2.

Anyway. A stunning mechanic, by nature, takes control away from the player who gets stunned. Most competitive players feel this breaks away from the FPS norm too much. They've become set in their ways(imo), and just blanket-banned it instead of learning to adapt.

[atmuh]

because its still way too powerful in the hands of someone thats skilled with it

[Bleck]

the sandman is banned because competitive players are whiny babies

edit: if you stop and think about it the logic eventually boils down to players saying 'if you didn't stun me I totally would have killed you!!!' which is kind of hilarious

[zircon]

http://www.zirconstudios.com/music/w...odispenser.mp3