[Brandon Strader]

Originally Posted by RiverSound

You remind me of someone. I believe his name was The oinkness, the master of trolling in various ways; Subtle, vulgar, direct, indirect, serious, lighthearted...

Who are you? Who are you? What do you claim to know, Mr. Snacks 'n' Jackson from August 2011?!

IRREGARDLESS, the history of The Oinkness has nothing to do with fat person discrimination at OCR..... OR DOES IT?

You just blew my mind.

[KyleJCrb]

How many places DO offer oversized clothing? Not many. This is nothing new and hardly exclusive to OCR. It probably boils down to low demand, the higher cost of larger clothing, or the printing companies not offering sizes that large in general.

Isn't this the second time you've made this post? Besides, I thought you didn't like this place anyway. Why do you want to wear its logo around on yourself?

[Brandon Strader]

Originally Posted by KyleJCrb

Besides, I thought you didn't like this place anyway. Why do you want to wear its logo around on yourself?

I don't know why you would think that, honestly. I've been a regular since 2009, have 12 remixes posted and another 25 to be posted, gone to MAGFest twice (and OCR Las Vegas once) specifically to meet up with OC ReMix, not to mention an album coming out here soon and another one that is a couple months away from ending production (hopefully). I've had my share of disappointments with the panel and I have been vocal about that in the past, but nothing has been substantial enough to turn me away from participating, enjoying, and being appreciative of OCR.

[DarkeSword]

Not enough demand for larger sized shirts, to the point where it may not be worth it to do a run.

[RiverSound]

Originally Posted by Brandon Strader

Who are you? Who are you? What do you claim to know, Mr. Snacks 'n' Jackson from August 2011?!

IRREGARDLESS, the history of The Oinkness has nothing to do with fat person discrimination at OCR..... OR DOES IT?

You just blew my mind.

Looks can be quite deceiving, n00b. Do not underestimate my power. Besides, I'm about to get promoted. So in your face.
P.s. In addition to my mind power, having been a "regular OCR visitor" since Summer 2006 contributes to my vast amount of knowledge. But now, my time has cometh. You will hear from me again.

[Palpable]

Originally Posted by Brandon Strader

It's something I've been noticing a lot for a while, your shirt sizes go up to what, XL?

While it's fun to have this little argument about Brandon's cred, shirt sizes go up to XXXL. eStarland may be sold out atm, but we do have them and sometimes take one or two to cons.

[urdailywater]

Apparently I can't go YES (conditional) on production issues anymore, so tone down the sizzle, balance the production, and then send it on back for the win.

Quote from this thread: http://ocremix.org/forums/showthread.php?t=38283

I remember seeing this pop up in a few other threads too, iirc.

I'm curious as to the extreme of this though. Does this only apply to big production issues, or does it also apply to small issues too? It seems like it would be fine for small things like small volume issues or maybe panning issues. Or maybe even compression issues in a particular part of a song. Since they're quick fixes, should that really warrant them to go through the whole submission and evaluation process completely?

Unless I'm misconstruing the extreme of this like I mentioned earlier.

[Brandon Strader]

Well what they do is they say:

Can Brandon fix this in an hour? Probably. Can he fix it in 5 minutes? With Larry there stopwatching him as he works? NO! (resub pls)

I actually don't know why they say "quick fixes" but say 5 minutes. What is the difference between doing the fixes in 5 minutes or an hour? Isn't it likely you couldn't even contact a judge within 5 minutes to have the new version sent to them, or the judge wouldn't see the message within 5 minutes?

[Palpable]

Originally Posted by urdailywater

Quote from this thread: http://ocremix.org/forums/showthread.php?t=38283

I remember seeing this pop up in a few other threads too, iirc.

I'm curious as to the extreme of this though. Does this only apply to big production issues, or does it also apply to small issues too? It seems like it would be fine for small things like small volume issues or maybe panning issues. Or maybe even compression issues in a particular part of a song. Since they're quick fixes, should that really warrant them to go through the whole submission and evaluation process completely?

Unless I'm misconstruing the extreme of this like I mentioned earlier.

We had a little judges pow wow earlier this year and decided that conditional votes were being overapplied where they didn't make sense. In some cases, it was making the judging process take longer instead of shorter, because it would make the current count of votes unclear. For an experienced remixer, rebalancing a mix might not take long, but for many newer musicians, it would be a challenge. We're trying to start using conditional only for very quick fixes like fadeout or encoding problems. We do prioritize resubmits to some extent to make up for this change.

[Mirby]

when y'all gonna judge that twewy mix? it's from december and it's a resubmit. prioritize that! :P

(seriously though i would love for that song to be posted and it's been sitting there for six months)