ReMix: Phantasy Star III: Generations of Doom 'Nial and Nowhere'
- Game: Phantasy Star III: Generations of Doom (Sega, 1990, GEN)
- ReMixer(s): Quinn Fox
- Composer(s): Izuho Takeuchi
- Song(s): 'Town'
- Posted: 2002-08-31, evaluated by the judges
Quinn Fox had some excellent source material to work with here - we share a mutual appreciation for the PS3 soundtrack at large, and this track is definitely a standout. I think Quinn did an admirable job with this light, floaty, angelic, largely harp + choir arrangement - a big fan of the original, there are things I would have done differently, and I might one day cover this myself, but I did enjoy this rendition. It's a fairly direct interpretation of a rather short piece, adding more ornate instrumentation and minimalist brush drums. General observation from the judges was positive, but noted that the piece was largely mid-to-upper frequencies and could have used some EQ to beef up the all-but-absent low end. I'd like to add in that I think the original is one of the more flagrant examples of how the Phantasy Star soundtracks can compete head-to-head with the works of Nintendo and Sony guys like Uematsu and Mitsuda. Overlooked and undervalued, I've seen recently that the original Phantasy Star series will be coming out as 'Phantasy Star Collection' for the Gameboy Advance. Not sure how I feel about the original games on a Nintendo console (actually, I'm pretty sure I find it disturbing and a bit unholy) but it'll be interesting to see what they do with the music. Coming back from my tangent - not necessarily Quinn's best work, and I feel given the strength of the source material he could have pushed himself a bit further, but an enjoyable piece nonetheless. If you've never even heard the original, don't hesitate at all.
- tweek on October 16, 2009
endblink;3838 wrote: Fault one: The length. It's way to short. Especially since the end of the song really starts to build. You get into it right as it finishes.
Fault two: The fade out. TERRIBLE. It gives it a feel that the ReMixer didn't know where he was going with this... or didn't know where he wanted to go with it, so he just didn't go anywhere with it. The fade is the biggest 'What the-?' I've heard in a while.
Fault three: Taking the first two faults in mind, I feel this mix could have had more. The ReMixer is certainly talented enough. I truly feel he could have taken more liberties with the song. Make us go somewhere. While I can tell the differences, there's not enough to them. Of course, I won't say what that 'more' could be, that up to the ReMixer, but it definately left me wanting 'more'.
I can see what was meant about wanting the length to be extended, but that was never a big deal. It got in, it got out; win.
Also, harping on fadeouts regardless of context is one of the dumbest criticisms ever in the community. It was always dumb when Prot did it, and it's dumb now. :lol:
- Liontamer on July 14, 2009
--Eino
- evktalo on December 16, 2008
I pretty much agree with all of the other reviews; It has a wonderful nostalgic feeling, and a very serene atmosphere, but it is dragged off to fadeout land just as things are getting good. It seems like Quinn just ran out of an idea, and I think that he should have just shelved the mix for a few months and come back to it rather than do the fadeout.
A half baked classic, if that's even possible.
- OA on April 18, 2007
I love how it then goes over into something that sounds like a music box. Like if someone is reliving his or hers childhood. When i read the other comments about this one, I prepared my mind for what supposed to be a horrible fade-out. I can agree that it doesn't fade very quickly, but it ain't bad if you would say.
Peaceful regards to Quinn, nicw work.:nicework
- Bummerdude on January 7, 2006
I think this is a cool sounding remix that was brought to a finish before it was ready to be done.
- The Coop on March 31, 2003
- GrayLightning on December 24, 2002
Cool anyway.
PD
- PrOfUnD Darkness on September 13, 2002
Quinn Fox. Get the criticism and your next remix will be wonderful :)
6/10 (1=worst; 10=best)
- Hamu-Sumo on September 7, 2002
- Evilhead on September 3, 2002
I re-downloaded it and was surprised to hear it sound so much better... but still needing more work.
Fault one: The length. It's way to short. Especially since the end of the song really starts to build. You get into it right as it finishes.
Fault two: The fade out. TERRIBLE. It gives it a feel that the ReMixer didn't know where he was going with this... or didn't know where he wanted to go with it, so he just didn't go anywhere with it. The fade is the biggest 'What the-?' I've heard in a while.
Fault three: Taking the first two faults in mind, I feel this mix could have had more. The ReMixer is certainly talented enough. I truly feel he could have taken more liberties with the song. Make us go somewhere. While I can tell the differences, there's not enough to them. Of course, I won't say what that 'more' could be, that up to the ReMixer, but it definately left me wanting 'more'.
- endblink on August 31, 2002
Well, I can't compare it to the original, but this is overall a very strong effort. It's short, but there's one fine arrangment packed into the two minutes this song runs. However, two things really ruined it for me. The first was the way the song faded - I've never liked fades, and this was implimented especially poorly (next time, give the user some clue that the songs about to end). Also, the engeneering is way off. This needs some major EQ work to put some highs in, since it sounds really muted right now. But if you can get past the flaws, this really is a worthwhile download.
- orkybash on August 31, 2002
Content Policy
(Submission
Agreement and Terms of Use)
Page generated Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:22:49 -0500 in 0.0554 seconds
All compositions, arrangements, images, and trademarks are copyright their respective owners. Original content is
copyright OverClocked ReMix, LLC. For information on RSS and JavaScript news feeds, linking to us, etc. please refer to resources for webmasters. Please refer to the Info section of
the site and the FAQ available there for information about the site's
history, features, and policies. Contact David W. Lloyd (djpretzel), webmaster, with
feedback or questions not answered there.
Discussion: Latest 13 comments/reviews; view the