Dafydd Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 So apparently, according the latest e-mail, Larry has ReMix suggestions. Do those have a better chance at passing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KyleJCrb Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 Suggestions for remixes that are already on the site, not in the making. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dafydd Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 Oh. I seem to have gotten things very backwards. The true situation makes a lot more sense. Thanks for clearing that up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big giant circles Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 If there's one remix that I will vote YES on EVERY SINGLE TIME, it would have to be ICE CAP. I don't even listen to them half the time. I just look and see that it's an Ice Cap remix, and I just YES it with complete confidence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dafydd Posted December 13, 2009 Share Posted December 13, 2009 Well, why wouldn't you? It's Ice Cap, after all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabeel Ansari Posted December 13, 2009 Share Posted December 13, 2009 If there's one remix that I will vote YES on EVERY SINGLE TIME, it would have to be ICE CAP.I don't even listen to them half the time. I just look and see that it's an Ice Cap remix, and I just YES it with complete confidence. Hmm... ...hehehe... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Level 99 Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 I don't know if this has been answered yet or not, though my forum search didn't find anything for it, but is there a particular reason that there are no remixer names on the judge's queue list? I know the post is supposed to be information for people who have submitted mixes or are tracking a mix, so I was curious as to the reason why names aren't listed while the sub date, game name, and song title is listed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abadoss Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 I don't know if this has been answered yet or not, though my forum search didn't find anything for it, but is there a particular reason that there are no remixer names on the judge's queue list? I know the post is supposed to be information for people who have submitted mixes or are tracking a mix, so I was curious as to the reason why names aren't listed while the sub date, game name, and song title is listed. I would imagine for the same reason they don't list the URL for rejected tracks. Theoretically, you should know which mix is yours and, while cool to show off that you got a mix approved waaay before it's posted, if you happen to be one of the ones rejected, that could be potentially embarrassing. Naturally, I don't know the exact reason, but, if I were responsible for it, that would be my reasoning. Judges? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emunator Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 But... your rejection thread gets sent to a public forum anyway, so you can see not only the name of everyone that's getting rejected, but everything about their submission, so that can't be the reason... Perhaps it's to make it a bigger surprise when a queued mix gets posted? I dunno, I'd like to see remixer names attached to the posted/queued tracks, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palpable Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 Honestly, it's just a matter of convenience for us. When we update that thread, we just copy the thread titles (minus some judge-only information), and the thread title is sometimes long enough that we would have to leave out the remixer name, so we don't include it on our end. Simply put, it's just one more thing that would delay judging, and I don't think much is gained from doing it. It also adds even more information to the already bloated Currently... thread. OA has been updating that thread lately, so if he wants to do it, that's cool with me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceansAndrew Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I agree that it doesn't really add a ton of information to the thread, as the NO's get the thread posted anyways. However, I do think that having a more standard "currently.." thread update schedule would be nice. I'll be doing it Wednesdays at noon from here on out. That way people will know the day that it's updated, so they don't have to keep randomly checking it and seeing no updates. They can check on Wednesday and see what's new. I just updated it, so it's a day early this week, but it'll stick to the schedule from here on out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anosou Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 I agree that it doesn't really add a ton of information to the thread, as the NO's get the thread posted anyways.However, I do think that having a more standard "currently.." thread update schedule would be nice. I'll be doing it Wednesdays at noon from here on out. That way people will know the day that it's updated, so they don't have to keep randomly checking it and seeing no updates. They can check on Wednesday and see what's new. I just updated it, so it's a day early this week, but it'll stick to the schedule from here on out. Who are you again...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abadoss Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 I agree that it doesn't really add a ton of information to the thread, as the NO's get the thread posted anyways.However, I do think that having a more standard "currently.." thread update schedule would be nice. I'll be doing it Wednesdays at noon from here on out. That way people will know the day that it's updated, so they don't have to keep randomly checking it and seeing no updates. They can check on Wednesday and see what's new. I just updated it, so it's a day early this week, but it'll stick to the schedule from here on out. Very cool. Might want to turn off the smilies in that thread, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceansAndrew Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 Very cool. Might want to turn off the smilies in that thread, though. why do you hate smileys? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabeel Ansari Posted December 24, 2009 Share Posted December 24, 2009 Why are you guys adding August remixes when there are still remixes from July and back? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emunator Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 No question here, but I wanted to say how awesome it is that Larry is doing his part to spread Christmas cheer by NO'ing all of the paneled songs with Christmas colors That's painfully ironic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozovian Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 Why are you guys adding August remixes when there are still remixes from July and back? Prob. one of the perks of being a judge. They can panel their subs directly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big giant circles Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 also, since there's only one (sometimes two) guys handling the inbox, it's more important for them to always be moving songs to the panel. At the very least, once it's to the panel, we can start chipping away at it. Before it gets to us, it's quite literally dead in the water. Any progress > No progress, wouldn't you agree? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkeSword Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 No question here, but I wanted to say how awesome it is that Larry is doing his part to spread Christmas cheer by NO'ing all of the paneled songs with Christmas colors That's painfully ironic. How is that ironic?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabeel Ansari Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 How is that ironic?! Maybe... because Christmas is supposed to be happy and getting NO'd on the panel with Christmas colors is... Okay never mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big giant circles Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 I'll admit, the Red and Green "NO" votes are kind of lol to me, however it's worth noting that both Larry and I are donating at least a couple hours of our holiday to moving the queue along Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabeel Ansari Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 (edited) I'll admit, the Red and Green "NO" votes are kind of lol to me, however it's worth noting that both Larry and I are donating at least a couple hours of our holiday to moving the queue along Thanks for that, judges. It's nice to see that you guys take the time to listen to all of the submissions and vote. Every vote is a step closer to and judging my mix in the queue (it was subbed in October, so I gotta wait about 2-3 months for you guys to get to it. The faster you judge, the closer you'll be to judging mixes subbed much more recently, and maybe you'll actually catch up to judging mixes subbed in the same month you're judging them). (And hopefully I won't get NO'd ) Edited December 26, 2009 by Neblix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emunator Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 (edited) Maybe... because Christmas is supposed to be happy and getting NO'd on the panel with Christmas colors is...Okay never mind. That's pretty much what I meant, though there's a good chance I was misusing the word "irony" because it was 3 AM And it was completely in jest, I definitely appreciate the work going into keeping things moving along! Edited December 26, 2009 by Emunator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabeel Ansari Posted December 29, 2009 Share Posted December 29, 2009 But seriously, I ask why are there August mixes being judged when there are still July (and back) mixes in the queue?! That's not fair, guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liontamer Posted December 29, 2009 Author Share Posted December 29, 2009 But seriously, I ask why are there August mixes being judged when there are still July (and back) mixes in the queue?! That's not fair, guys. Thanks you for bringing this to our attention. Clearly we were not aware of this until you told us, again and again and again. We're already getting to 'em. They're being got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.