oryaaaaa Posted August 14, 2012 Share Posted August 14, 2012 I know "Final Fantasy VII - Voices of the Lifestream". then more sound quality increased music player... I created "Bug head". MP3->[brown mode]->SACD? M4A->[brown mode]->SACD quality? 96kHz FLAC->[RED mode]->Is SACD an underdog? Softpedia "Bug head Ver1.753" http://www.softpedia.com/get/Multimedia/Audio/Audio-Players/Bug-head.shtml This software is a digital remaster music player made with unique sound processing technology designed by us to pursue the sound of the world’s highest quality. Instant appliances are ready to start this software, you can enjoy sound as high as high-end sound or much higher. It is the software free of charge forever !! Support Audio files ( but I didn't check all files. ) 16 bit or 24 bit or 32bit 44.1kHz / 48kHz / 88.2kHz / 96kHz / 176.4kHz / 192kHz (only one) WAV / OGG / FLAC / M4A / AAC / ALAC(M4A) / WMA / MP3 / WV CDA (CD Audio, long waiting time) Audio output unit required for this software includes devices such as a headphone amplifier and a headphone applicable for 88.2ｋHz and 176.4kHz, an integral multiple of 44.1kHz for instance. Headphone amplifiers with I2S input interface with high precision reclocking functions using XMOS chips for USB AUDIO CLASS 2 are sold in Japan and Korea in the run-up to the world market. “izo iHA-21EX “ owned by the developer was used for operation verification of the software. WindowsXP: need ASIO driver Windows7: WASAPI (EXCLUSIVE mode only) Windows7 PC need to support follows frequency 44.1kHz MP3: [x2] support 88.2kHz, [x4] support 176.4kHz 48.0kHz FLAC:[x2] support 96.0kHz, [x4] support 192.0kHz 96.0kHz FLAC:[x1] support 96.0kHz, [x2] support 192.0kHz -------Thanks I am always happily listening to the work created with Overcloker remix. oryaaaaa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabeel Ansari Posted August 14, 2012 Share Posted August 14, 2012 http://www.winamp.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oryaaaaa Posted August 15, 2012 Author Share Posted August 15, 2012 Winamp is poor sound quality. It's for child. Winamp :: Cheap sound Bug head: Hi-end rich sound Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMT Posted August 15, 2012 Share Posted August 15, 2012 are you a robot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DusK Posted August 15, 2012 Share Posted August 15, 2012 But with Bug head, instant appliances are ready to start this software. You can enjoy sound as high as high-end sound or much higher! Try with Overcloker remix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollgagh Posted August 15, 2012 Share Posted August 15, 2012 are you a robot he's (probably) japanese, given his name and location edit: good lord guys, could you at least try to give him a fair shake before making fun of his english He's obviously trying to promote his free software that he developed; although he could do with a working link to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. L Posted August 15, 2012 Share Posted August 15, 2012 Interesting. Off-topic: I only dabbled in QBasic, but I've never got to try PureBasic, which, I infer, is what you used to develop this. Anyway, best of luck to you in the continued development of your software, sir, and thanks for making it free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabeel Ansari Posted August 15, 2012 Share Posted August 15, 2012 Winamp is poor sound quality. It's for child.Winamp :: Cheap sound Bug head: Hi-end rich sound Can you explain your reasoning as to why Bug Head is better and not just say it's better? I've never heard of poor sound quality in a media player. That's usually the issue with the actual file itself or the speakers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psychowolf Posted August 15, 2012 Share Posted August 15, 2012 I would make fun like the rest of you guys but personally i am kinda interested in how much compatibility this program has with many different type of files and formats. The only issue i see is a lack of compatibility with vista being listed. Not everyone was lucky to buy a PC when windows 7 came out and got stuck with vista. If you haven't already i suggest creating compatibility with both vista and mac's as well. and good luck with competing with the already well established winamp you'l need it. (hence why if you get it compatible with both vista and macs you'l have more of a fighting chance) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newt Posted August 15, 2012 Share Posted August 15, 2012 It seems like he wrote some filters that will distort the sound a bit to make it "better". That's what I got from the OP anyway.. Not sure why passing waveforms through filters makes it "better" though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabeel Ansari Posted August 15, 2012 Share Posted August 15, 2012 He actually doesn't modify the sound at all. I just played a wav mix of mine on this thing and on Winamp; the only difference I heard was that this Bug Head player is louder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meteo Xavier Posted August 15, 2012 Share Posted August 15, 2012 That might be useful for me actually... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avaris Posted August 15, 2012 Share Posted August 15, 2012 In the first part of the post I am assuming SACD it referring to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Audio_CD The easiest way for any DSP function to increase quality in the digital realm is to "Upsample." Which is the same as Oversampling that some people with find on Synthesizers. Although the claim for winamp sucking would seem to be overstated: http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?t=333955 Winamp itself can "Upsample" a sound source. On a side note filters are used in the DSP process for Upsampling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixto Posted August 15, 2012 Share Posted August 15, 2012 andy timmons - deliver us, 44.1khz flac file playing in winamp andy timmons - deliver us, 44.1khz flac file playing in bughead digital clipping is definitely not "Hi-end rich sound" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KyleJCrb Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Didn't you know, Sixto? Anything louder is automatically better. No exceptions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy P Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 So does this software change the tone of the music at all? Or is it intended as a 'loudness' maximiser? The whole argument about increasing the sample rate seems a bit silly to me, since the quality won't actually increase. You are always guessing what will be inbetween, not actually what is there. The only reason for over-sampling IMO would be 1-bit DACs, but that is a different issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Briggs Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 dude I played skrillex with your player and it blew my speakers you owe me a lot of money dude I can't believe you just ruined my speakers how am I supposed to produce music now??? these are expensive monitors!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meteo Xavier Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 How much of that is true, Ben? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Derrit Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 thirty five billion dollar hat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.