Argle Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Writing orchestral music can be a massive pain in the ass from an infrastructure point of view, so I figure we could talk shop. This is an open-ended thread; any questions, comments, or tips about setting up an effective orchestral template are great. I'm curious how other people go about this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nutritious Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Well, a long time ago I posted a free template I created when I was doing orchestral mixes with free sounds/samples. It's yonder if you're curious. Wow, can't believe I first posted that over 5 years ago now. My current template is a bit more organized, with 4 instances of EWQLSO grouped by sections on the mixer: Strings, Brass, Woodwinds, Percussion. I've saved each of the 4 groups of multi's in EWQLSO for quick loading on other projects or in case I accidentally delete something. For example, the Strings Multi has 4 legato patches and 4 staccato patches for violins, violas, cellos, & basses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XPRTNovice Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 I almost never use the same orchestration twice, and I've been continually upgrading and changing my samples, so a template doesn't make sense for me just yet. I've definitely thought of it though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iostream Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 I keep a standard template for orchestral pieces, and remove tracks I don't need once the basic composition is done. My standard template uses 5 16 out instances of kontakt: 1 Percussion (4 frequently used patches loaded, 4 empty slots) 2 Strings (fully loaded) 3 Brass (3 albion brass patches loaded 5 empty slots) 4 Woodwinds/Piano (Albion woodwinds hi/lo plus a piano, 5 empty slots) 5 Synth (8 empty slots) In this template, all empty slots already have their midi tracks and outputs enabled and routed. This makes it fast and easy to add new sounds with minimal hassle. I also have all tracks going prefader to a reverb bus so I can get a basic feel as I am writing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argle Posted May 31, 2013 Author Share Posted May 31, 2013 I've been tweaking my template for awhile now, it's pretty good though I still need to balance the volume for everything. Certain libraries seem to be louder than others. Reaper has very flexible track routing. It's a snap to route MIDI from one track to multiple other tracks. I'm thinking this might be useful to set up impromptu sections for unison playing. Then you have the choice of triggering instruments separately, or play one of the group tracks. IDK, maybe it's just a novelty idea with little value. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argle Posted May 31, 2013 Author Share Posted May 31, 2013 Do people prefer keyswitches, or separate tracks? Up until now I've been on the side of keyswitching, though it's kind of getting on my tits lately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iostream Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 That's one of the advantages of Cubase Expression maps... You don't have to care what any given library uses. I wish every DAW would pick that up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dissidia Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 I have a template for MSO, it's the essential instruments and some more. I load different articulations in the same kontakt and use midi channels 1-5-9-13 (ease of visibility in FL). Works for MSO because I can put the separate articulations in, otherwise I like to use keyswitches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.