Jump to content

LuIzA

Members
  • Posts

    361
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by LuIzA

  1. Jeebus

    FINALLY

    I decided to revive my long forgotten OCR account just to say that haha. I didn't find a project thread, so it had to be here.

    well, first off, thank you all for the kind words. much appreaciated =)

    I noticed my comments on the song page here were outdated haha. Chris and I redid the song a year after it was first finished, which I'm guessing is when I submitted it. The main difference is just the little bridge section. The wah guitar was replaced for a clean guitar and I changed my solo there.

    god it has been awhile haha. This is one fine project. congrats to all!

    PS: do check out Myth´s Zelos mix, it´s an awesome track and it has my wah guitar there... I guess that´s where it went haha.

  2. well, the main problem I had with the policy was clarified now. I however still have a problem with the fact that ocr can deny a remove request. sure its annoying when people just go and do it out of impulse, but isnt that still in their right? afterall, they are still the owner of the arrangement... I do agree with the fact that if you remove a song, you cant submit. but deny a remove request doesnt seem too right.

    EDIT:and yes, the fact that things are being set into stone is rather scary for a `just for fun` musician such as myself.

  3. First of all, take a deep breath.

    The arrangement is, if I understand correctly, still yours. However, distribution of such work under the OC_remix "label" is OCR's propriety. I doubt that djp will react badly if you distribute your remix on your own, without the OCR label. I think you fail to see that djp is doing this to protect you and your music. Since OCR is a gray area, before the policy anyone could download a song, and use it commercially with you and OCR lacking any resources to stop him.

    Now, through this agreement, distribution of the OCR labeled remix is subjected to DJP's rules (which means no one can just download it and make money off of it... TAKE THAT POLAND), and distribution of your original work is subject to your own decisions. Meaning that while it is available for free online through OCR, it won't be possible to use the fact that OCR is free to allow anyone to use your music without you OR djp agreeing.

    thing is, I don`t want anyone else (e.g OCR/djp) having a say on that in the first place.

    Fair enough, but what would you want to do with your music that this policy prevents?

    yeah, well I got a full length vg cover cd here in the works which I AM going to include a track I have posted here. according to this policy it seems OCR has a say whether I can do it or not. and that is something I am not willing to accept.

    I'm pretty sure djp's question was rhetorical...

    I think you're reacting more to the *idea* of a policy than the actual policy itself. Take a chill pill and actually go through it phrase by phrase, and if there's anything you disagree with, list it in this thread and explain why. djp is a reasonable person, things can be worked out.

    If you actually are disagreeing with the actual concept of a policy...well, I guess you're free to opt out and feel good about randomly "fighting the power" for no reason if you want.

    I think OCR started out that way, but quickly evolved into something different from the "just for fun" sites like VGMix quite a while ago. That's arguably what started the whole exodus in the first place.

    P.S. I think AD wins hard. Frawress victoly.

    yes, I read the policy through before saying anything and I`m quite calm... I AM disagreeing with both the items I find limiting to me in the policy AND to the fact that there IS a policy.

    first off, my music IS being distributed for free here and it has been that way for 5 years now. that being said, personally I don`t think you guys are in any position to put a policy now. the fact that I own my arrangements makes it up to me to stop people from something if I don`t like what they`re doing with my song, not ocr. and well, I don`t want it to be up to them. this site was meant to host songs, and I don`t think it should have more power over the music it hosts.

    second off, whether I have a cd in the works or not, I still make music `just for fun` and that`s how it`ll stay, that means I don`t want my music subject to policies. I`m not even trying to `fight the power` as you say, ocr can do whatever they want just as long as it doesnt affect me. if that`s too much for you guys to understand, then at least just take my music down and get it over with.

  4. Indeed. We're going into detail, and we're asking for feedback, at this stage. Not going into detail and dismissing the whole thing is an attitude I simply can't respect, and one I've never personally held in my entire life. If you object to something, state your objection. Otherwise... who are you? If you're the type of person that flatly objects to something but refuses to say why, at all, or explain yourself in any way... then yes, it's probably better that your music isn't here.

    I don't want my music there because it seems to me you guys want to have more power over my music than just hosting it, and having a comment system for it. Isn't that what this site is about? a vg community for who wants to listen? not for you having any exclusivity over what's mine. Sure the original music covered is legally owned by their respective companies, but my arrangements are legally mine, and mine alone. I want my music subject only to what I want to do with it, given all the legal crap, and that's that. So there, here's why I don't like your policy.

    and as for who I am? I'm the fucker you direct posted, and now the one who doesn't agree with your policy.

  5. Mandolins are the best part out of this high quality song. I like the melody that it plays, and such. What is that part a remix of?! I can't stop thinking about that part in the song. Aural blissssssssss. And I haven't seen one person really express how great that part is. Really sticks out, and has good structure from the first part of it to the second.

    mountain pass ~ conde petie (FFIX)

    thanks =)

  6. I'm really surprised by the incredible sound quality of this. Definitely sounds Black Mages inspired. It's a lot cleaner than anything the Black Mages did, too. Being a drummer since 1999, I must say the drum sequencing is quite believable. Great job on the guitar, especially the leads. The synths and bass are nicely sequenced, too .. but mostly the guitar adds to the studio quality factor. Highly recommended! Great high-speed car music, too!

    thanks for the comments =)

    one thing though, bass is not sequenced. (and neither are the mandolins) just so it's known

    on another note, amazingly enough I don't like the black mages' work much at all honestly. even though I do see how the 'hunter's chance' part sounds like something they might do.

  7. first off, thanks a lot, everyone =) really

    I have to be honest and say this is my favorite song by myself and the one I had most fun making. it was a pretty old idea I had

    Nope, it was never finished. Ashane still has some mastering to do and she wants to re-record the vocals i think

    yep, it was never finished. more precisely, there was lots of re-recording ashane wanted to do, and I did in fact, re-record my vox, and it seemed he didn't like it as much while I did... but oh well. that's been so long ago haha

    Wow this is NICE. Good debut mix. Make more musics please.

    EDIT: Outside of this, are you publicly recognized? Because judging from this, you are extremely talented- in production, arrangement, and all out thrashing. You should totally put together some solo VG Moosicks shows.

    and no I'm not publicly recognized, and quite honestly I want to keep it that way. still.. thanks =)

×
×
  • Create New...