blahzae Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DB-rIntpJxA Comments Welcome! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captaineegee Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 While I have no constructive criticism to offer, I can say that I really enjoyed your take on this song. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necrox Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 I think this is a cool and unique take on a heavily remixed source. My only gripe is that the lead melody was buried when it came in, but overall very nice. You kept it relevant to the source material while adding a hip-hop-like vibe that worked (at least for my ears). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Base Desire Posted June 19, 2013 Share Posted June 19, 2013 Blahzae, I really like this! I love the little synths, especially the glides down. I Think the instrument choices are great, they sound very cute and poppy. I like it. Very nice drums, especially the hi-hat patterns. -- Except there is like 5 minutes of dead air at the end. . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Hakštok Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 You stayed pretty close to the source, which is not a bad thing unless you're planning to submit this to the panel Like it's already been mentioned, the first lead is too quiet. You could try to bring it's volume up a bit and then do some EQ dips in the other instruments to make it stand out. I can't think of any more constructive comments unfortunately. Just gonna say that I liked this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theory of N Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 I think the balance is an issue here. The drums overpower everything else by quite a bit. The kick and snare don't have to be so prominent to be effective. Like Hak said, it's really close to the original. It's basically the same song with different instruments, which is okay. You did a good job of it but again, like Hak said, if you plan to submit this to OCR, you'll probably want to do a bit more with it arangementally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.