I would hardly call the mountain of shovelware that the wii has a strong library. Or crappy motion control ports of PS2 games a strong library. Or all the old games that are rereleased on Wii Ware. Also beating old games does nothing for your argument except say "I beat this old game that, while is availible to play on the Wii, I have had 20 years to practice at it on the system that it originally came out on."
I have had all of the current console generation. While yes I do have leanings towards 360, I would hardly call it a fanboy obsession. The reason my 360 gets more playtime than my PS3 is because most third-party Multi-platform games get developed on the 360 first and then ported to the PS3. Therefore most of them run much smoother. Logic and rational thinking my friend. Halo Reach was not great, nor was Halo 3, and especially ODST. Sure that may not prove that I am not a fanboy, but that is the cry of the typical Xbox Fanboy.
Also, who counts on me? I have said several times that I am not a credible source of information. Save for my vast knowledge of Rock Band and what not. All my opinions are what they are. Opinions. Nothing more. Granted they are more antagonistic than most, but that is because I don't let the small shit in games slide.
If anything I am not a fanboy, but an anti-fanboy. Someone who has a bias toward something, but no pro-bias. My bias against the Wii comes from nintendo's lack of care that they put into most of their games. Occasionally they try to shake things up like in Mario Galaxy, which added some great stuff to the formula of Mario games. Then other times they try it but don't put any love into it like with Metroid Other M. But mostly they recycle the same tired formula. Like with every Zelda game since Ocarina. Do I feel Nintendo owes me? No, but I do feel that they can do better.
DS is still strong though!