Jump to content

po!

Members
  • Posts

    206
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by po!

  1. this "original feel" stuff is a really graaay area. you could argue that anything short of the actual original doesn't have the original feel. if someone arranged a track to have the original feel, then what's the point? why not just listen to the original. and feel is totally subjective anyways, since everybody feels somethin different when listening to music

  2. the time it takes also depends on the type of music you're doing. stuff that relies heavily on live instruments could be done in a matter of hours, while electronica with a million different samples and textures and having to do some tedious editing could take a looong time

    of course for recording, the thing that's left out of the equation is the thousands of hours spent practicing your instrument(s). and if you're proficient at keyboard, then that could make you blazing fast since you can record a bunch of MIDI parts with just keyboard (like virt and joshua morse)

  3. Someone at the One Ups booth said you were there and I wanted to meet you but I really had no idea how to find you D:

    oh, and I did buy OneUps vol. 2 :)

    Mustin, post here when you can, I wanna know if you got back home okay without your wallet :(

    aww too bad i missed you. maybe next time...

    btw Mustin made it back to arkansas just fine

  4. just downloaded Chrome and have been using it for a little while now. so far it's everything they said it would be.. it's really fast and responsive, javascript slowing down one tab doesn't affect other tabs

    if only they had this for linux...

  5. looks very promising.. and should be great IF it works like they say it does. but i probably won't switch unless it supports firefox extensions, or already has built in features like the ones i use (tabmix, easygestures, etc)

  6. EDIT: oh and someone might have mentioned it somewhere before, but why is everyone making the assumption that we'd reject these songs if they were submitted?! They haven't been subbed to this site and we haven't judged them, so you can't say that OCR would crap on arrangements like these.

    it's easy to assume cuz we can deduce what your criteria are for judging arrangements based on the many many judges decisions you've made over the past few years. even someone like me who rarely reads the judges decisions knows that you all reject arrangements that are too conservative (covers) and too liberal (not enough of the source material! NO)

  7. I thought the samples sounded pretty good. Pez, you're smoking something good if this is inhuman-sounding.

    actually i agree that they are a bit inhuman sounding... in the sense that the engineering sounds too perfect to the point that it sounds like samples and not live instruments. but it's a minor issue and i think the whole album sounds great

  8. I like the idea of individual techniques/topics being highlighted in videos, BUT...

    I'd also like to see a series of videos on the mix creation process, charting the development of a ReMix through to completion, then having that mix posted on the site. Something that explored different arrangement approaches, starting with a MIDI, going by ear, etc., showed how a couple different genre approaches to the same theme, then picked one and carried it through to the end. That's something that, while obviously more involved, will tell more of a story, and put everything in context.

    i was actually planning on doing that for the track that i'm working on now.. doing a "making of" vid. it turned out to be really difficult to get the camerawork that i wanted though. instead of just doing vidcaps of my screen i wanted to actually film me working at the computer, so i could do some sort of vlog and also for when i record instruments

    it was hard to find a good angle though.. one that would show me as well as get the content on my screen. so in the end i abandoned the idea.... for now. i still wanna find a way to do it tho

  9. If you remove the period it will find a shitload.

    Yeah, searchengines are like wine. They need to age before using.

    it doesn't work for any words that end with periods, like any abbreviations. like dr. or ave. or bros. ... pretty lame

  10. Am I alone in saying that I really don't see music as anything? mean, best thing I'll see is frequencies stacked from lo to high (like, a bass and a kick on the bottom while everything else is built on top).

    yea, i "see" music that way too. but that's just the way it sounds to my ear spatially, not really how my brain "sees" the music

    in a more general sense, i "see" music as MOVEMENT. chord progressions really PROGRESS.. they go somewhere and then come back. melodic lines go up, down, out, back in... it's like a roller coaster ride

  11. i don't have much to say about gear.. just get something and play. gear talk is fun but really doesn't amount to much

    i would recommend playing along with songs, any song with a reasonably simple bass line. even if you aren't good at reading music or tab or hearing the notes, once you hear what you're playing you'll be able to put it all together and figure it out. also playing along with something will develop your rhythm, which is the most important aspect of bass playing

  12. you might be able to find a phone shop that will activate it for you? or there might be ways to hack it yourself

    i've bought a phone off ebay.. but i'm not using verizon and with GSM you can just buy any unlocked phone and stick in your SIM card. i don't know how verizon's thing would work, but it's probably just punching in certain codes into the phone, which you might be able to find online

  13. Still looking for some feedback here and on the photos on my website if anyone can offer any.

    back from work now so i can click on the link :-P

    i think 690 is the definite standout of those pics.. great shot. the posing on 522 is kinda awkward. she looks like a corpse or something.. but maybe that was what you were going for

  14. For those of you who are fortunate to own a DSLR (it's ironic that I work at a camera store, yet don't have one, myself) I want to make one huge lens recommendation. Get yourself a good 50mm (or 55mm) lens. Something that's around f/1.2 to f/1.8. No zoom, please. Trust me, this is the one lens that everyone needs, but one one buys. With one of those lenses you can shoot pretty close, lightning fast, and you can get an awesomely shallow depth of field.

    They start at $99 for a Canon 50mm f/1.8 and $129 for a Nikkor 50mm f/1.8.

    Trust me, they may not zoom, but they're the best value you can get in a lense.

    the thing is, 50mm isn't a "normal" lens on digital. a 35 or 30 or 28 would provide the equivalent view as 50 on full frame sensors. those lenses are quite a bit more expensive than the 50

    anyways, i've pretty much made up my mind that my next lens will be the 85 f1.8, since i've got the normal range covered already. it wouldn't make sense for me to get a 50 or a 35

×
×
  • Create New...