Jump to content

PriZm

Members
  • Posts

    827
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by PriZm

  1. Well, yes, yes they did! They didn't have good security. Customers are trusting them with their data, and they aren't protecting it. That is wrong. How could having low/bad/no security, and/or not protecting the data past that security be "right" and/or "not doing anything wrong"?

    LulzSec has broken into ONE site with SQL injection (or so they claim anyways) and as far as I know, only the PSN had passwords in plain text.

    Where do you draw the line exactly regarding what is sufficient and insufficient security ? How can you be sure that Nintendo, Epic, Bethesda and Codemasters had insufficient security ? You are claiming that only because LulzSec has broken into their sites, that their security is horrible but how do you know ? And how do you know LulzSec are not extremely good or determined at hacking stuff ? My main point here is this: who are you, Crowbar Man, to judge what security is good and what is not ?

    See the difference here is that you are making a lot of assumptions and we are not. What we DO know however is that entering these sites and compromising the information they contain is criminal and wrong.

    Also, excellent security comes at the price of convenience and cost. Sure, we could all have personal VPN-like tokens like they use in private networks, but it would be more costly and, quite frankly, a hassle. If these game servers had to have as much security as the Pentagon (which was hacked several times), who knows how costly they would get.

  2. I am really at a loss here...

    So if someone invented a new type of key that could open any lock it would be OK for people to use it to break into other people's homes just to show them that their security is not up to date ? If I break a window to get into a store at night but I don't steal anything I am actually a good guy because I'm showing them that they should have had countermeasures for that ?

    Also correct me if I'm wrong but didn't those group made personal information about users accessible through IRC and such ? It's not exactly harmless fun. I really can't understand how people can defend these criminals. Their intention are not really important, they are stealing private information and trespassing on digital property.

  3. Did I say that they hacked solely to prove security holes existed? No, I said that it's better to have someone hack you for teh lulz than have someone hack you to steal something. Lesser of two evils, considering you are going to get hacked eventually. No digital security is perfect. These guys hacking sucks, but they are showing to these companies that their security is flawed; like I said, they could be less dickish (by showing them in private), but oh well.

    If you are given the choice between getting hacked by thieves or getting hacked by 13 year olds looking for some fun, which would you rather have? I'd rather have the neighborhood kid break into my house and show me that I'm using 3rd rate locks than have a thief break into my house and steal my TV.

    If they are going to get hacked eventually, why does the fact that they've been hacked for the 'lulz' prevent them from being hacked by thieves down the line ?

    If, like you are saying, they are gonna get hacked anyways, wouldn't the preferable way by being hacked as seldom as possible ?

  4. My excuse for not caring about that is due to not living in the united states and having an account with this bank.

    There is a difference between caring the situation because you are personally affected by it and raging at Sony just because.

    I don't wanna put words in his mouth, but I think zircon aimed that comment more at people who spout wide generalizations like 'Sony deserved it', 'Sony should give us $6000 dollars', 'Sony lied to its customers', 'Sony cannot protect their shit'. Those accusations simply sound childish and since they are the most vocal, they make video game fans look bad in general.

    Personally, I just find it irritating that those thieves would get support from people just because they justify their criminal attention-grabbing activities by saying they do it in the name of freedom of speech, freedom of information, etc.

    If anything, we should all be pissed at these thieves and not whatever company they decide to attack.

  5. I don't think a character's importance has anything to do on whether or not they will come back. There are many characters that are not so important to the story now like if you don't consider their personal vendettas.

    Also Ivy has been confirmed to be coming back :)

    EDIT:

    So far the confirmed character roster is :

    Patroklos

    Pyrrha

    Siegfried

    Nightmare (although we don't know in which form)

    Mitsurugi

    Ivy

    In the Japanese page it also says that Patroklos' parents are dead (Sophitia because of EVIL (?) and Rothion of sickness). In the demo gameplay video we also heard that Pyrrha was not aware that she had a younger brother because she had been kidnapped by Tira when she was a baby.

  6. She was 32 in SCIV, meaning she'll be 49 in this game's timeline (contrast to Sophitia's 42). PriZm is imagining Soul Calibur VI.

    That's still not that old, though. The dominatrix thing would start to cross the comfort line, but that changes her from creepy elder to potential cougar. I think a fair number of guys nowadays would be comfortable with that.

    Ivy always struck me as the most mature woman in that series, anyway, so I never really wondered if her outfit fit her age. Her coming back wouldn't be a blight upon mine eyes any more than it currently is.

    Oops yeah my mistake. 49 is really not that old, so yeah, we probably won't be getting any kickass older people.

  7. Well honestly we have no idea yet.

    Patroklos does not look like he would replace Cassandra, but I base that on his stance in the Pyrrha demo video alone, so it's a wild guess.

    I think we will have more info on the official Soul Calibur presentation at 14h00 PDT.

  8. So I picked m two free games (Dead Nation and Wipeout HD) and thanks to Sony's fucking horrible UI for the PlayStation Store, I did not get Wipeout HD. FUCK YOU SONY.

    dunno if this is what you are talking about, but for the third time:

    If at any point you can’t find the ‘Welcome Back Free Game 1 or 2’ products, the list of available titles or a game you’ve selected, go to your XMB>PlayStation Network>Account Management>Transaction Management>Services List>SCEA Promotions to complete the process.

  9. Shit looks slick !

    This is really exciting and I hope to be able to play it with some OCR folks in 2012.

    Also about Pyrrha having the same moves as Sophitia, it could mean anything. Sophitia might not come back and Pyrrha might be her replacement. Sophitia might come back and it the final version Pyrrha might have a completely different moveset than what we've seen in this demo.

×
×
  • Create New...