Jump to content

Poke'G

Members
  • Posts

    599
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Poke'G

  1. That's all incorrect. It takes place between Episodes 3 and 4, aka the Dark Times era. The Live Action TV series is not going to deal with Jedi stories; it's going to be about rogues and thieves and crime lords. More Han Solo, less Luke Skywalker.

    You're not gonna see Mara Jade; she's gonna be what, 4 years old? Younger? Likewise with Thrawn; he was on the edge of Chiss space during all that building up the Empire of the Hand. Xizor maybe, but honestly, Lucas rarely takes anything from the EU; in fact I think the only two things he's ever used from the EU are Coruscant and Aayla Secura.

    Boba Fett escaping the Sarlacc is a story that's already been done years ago in Tales of the Bounty Hunters; plus it happens after Return of the Jedi; there's no way it's going to be featured in the TV series.

    Really? I first heard about the live show after Celebration III, and the people I talked to were hyped that the Boba episode (which I am well aware was already done in TotBH) was to be one of the earlier stories covered. The way it seemed to be played up was reminiscent of how Lucas did the Young Indiana Jones series with subjects ranging from post Episode III all the way into the late EU.

    That's too bad they won't be doing post/mid original trilogy material; there's some fun stuff that could be covered without using the original human cast. I guess the info I've been going on all this time was overhyped. At least Boba taking up his father's trade is something they could do.

  2. I personally think they could turn a few of those graphic novels into movies. Those two brothers who accidently saved Boba Fett from the Sarlacc? Awesome. "Boba Fett does not scream like a little girl."

    Or that fight between Darth Maul and Darth Vader. Cloned by the old Sith Lords, he is sent to replace Vader, as it is believed that he is not strong enough (not enough hate) to carry on as the new Sith Lord under Darth Sidious. The fight is incredible, taking the two of them down to a lava pit. The whole scenery is very reminiscent of Anakin's final fight with Obi-wan. Complete, absolute irony.

    Vader spends most of the fight trying to keep his ground, while Maul bounces around and kicks Vader's ass with his Sith-Fu. Finally, he moves in for the kill when he knocks Vader's lightsaber out of his hands. At the last second, Vader pulls his weapon back to his hands and reverse-thrusts Maul right in the same damn spot that slew Master Qui-Gon. With his dying breath, Darth Maul asks Vader what he could possibly hate enough to kill him. Vader simply replies, "Myself."

    It was one of the most awe-inspiring stories I've ever read.

    I like the "What if..." Dark Horse did, where Maul survives the battle with Obi-Wan and eventualy replaces his lost lower torso with mechanical cetar-like legs. He seeks Obi-Wan out, tracking him to a very young Luke Skywalker on Tatooine. Obi-Wan has to rush to the Lars Homestead to save them (which he does) and we find just why Owen hates the Force so much.

    As for Boba Fett escaping the Sarlacc, I heard that is to be one of the episodes of the live action Star Wars show Lucas is currently working on. The show will supposedly focus on various separate subjects of the expanded universe instead of the established canon, meaning Thrawn, Mara Jade, and Xizor are all potential episode focus points.

  3. You bastards. This is going to end up being something that pops up on video game threads for years to come. "hey i found tis song frm mario cart but it not on mine wher's it from?" will be seen in forums until time ends.

    I've got to go with Damned on this, it's dumb to create hoaxes like this.

    It'll be "Mew is behind the truck by the S.S. Anne." all over again. I'll still run into people who think that was how you got Mew.

  4. You have to admit, Speed Racer was good.

    Indeed it was. I thought they would do a good job and they did. The sad story is that the public didn't seem to agree. Warner lost a ton of money on that movie.

    But where I could see a live action version of Speed Racer, Cowboy Bebop live seems like an abominable notion. I watch the series, see what they want to do now, and I have to ask why.

    Although, I guess it would be a lot like Serenity, but in such a case I'd rather see a Serenity 2.

  5. I think Nicholson did a better job of creating a comic book character. His Joker is more in tune with the sort of whackjob that runs around pulling crimes like they're pranks on the establishment.

    Ledger's Joker is just a regular genius psychopath. He plays a great one, no question there, but in terms of capturing the feel of the comic book Joker I don't think he comes nearly as close to it as Nicholson did.

    I'm going to agree with l-n-j-i-n and Lotd, Ledger played an awesome villain, but I never felt I was watching The Joker through most of the movie. When that comes up, everyone I talk to immediately references the pencil trick.

    Yes, no one is going to forget that moment, now name another Joker moment. There were a few, but we should have seen gags like that and off the wall hysterical laughing throughout the movie if it was Joker. They were sparse enough to feel like a reminder to whom the villain was supposed to be.

    Joker, no matter how serious and evil he is portrayed, has a level of corniness to his madness inherent in being The Joker, who was supposedly once a failed comedian. Nolan's serious world lost that touch.

    And on a side note to those ragging on Tim Burton's Batman, remember that it too was a phenomenon, was the first film to break $100 million in it's first ten days of release, and is the highest grossing DC film ever, and when Dark Knight passes it (an inevitable fact at this point) it will still be there above Begins.

  6. If the producers had enough faith in the material to want to take a crack at it, why not try and commission another animated movie from Watanabe?

    Why does everything animated have to go live action in Hollywood? It works often enough, but for some reason, Cowboy Bebop going live just seems absurd. In fact, considering Speed Racer bombed, I can't believe this got greenlit.

  7. Also, Batman just tackled Dent, he didn't mean to kill him or anything he just ended up falling. Also notice the coin landing face up, lucky side. Dent can still be alive or he can be dead, it's totally up to interpretation as of now

    I thought the coin was supposed to point out the pointlessness of the action taken, Dent died when the boy would have lived anyway.

    The flip being for Dent is an interesting way to look at it. I hope he comes back, even if it's not likely. It felt like there was so much more they could do with Two-Face.

  8. He had to choose between saving the boy and stopping Two-Face. Every other time, every other criminal, he could do both.

    At that point, he had no other alternative.

    Apparently you didn't read the rest of that post.

    Since Batman saved Rachel after falling from a height far beyond Two-Face's (with enough force to cave in a car)' date=' the fact he didn't in a lesser fall felt.... contradictory. Knocking him off made perfect sense, but then not trying to keep him alive when we saw he could do it earlier?[/quote']

    I argue he could have done both easily and gave reasoning why.

  9. SPOILERS (although if you haven't seen it by now, it's kind of your own fault for coming in here)

    That entire scene is one of the points of the movie. Is it more important for Batman to let Two-Face kill the boy if it means keeping his code? There has to be a line for villains to cross, and at that point Batman didn't really have any other choice.

    Sal Maroni landed on his legs; Two-Face landed on his spine.

    Two-Face methodically seeking out vengeance on single individuals crosses the line, but Joker causing rampant chaos and destruction while killing randomly in cold-blood doesn't?

    Besides, Batman had gone out of the way to keep the villainous from dying, especially emphasized with the Joker. Since Batman saved Rachel after falling from a height far beyond Two-Face's (with enough force to cave in a car), the fact he didn't in a lesser fall felt.... contradictory. Knocking him off made perfect sense, but then not trying to keep him alive when we saw he could do it earlier? Not to mention Two-Face survived a car crash that supposedly killed Maroni.

    If Nolan wanted a big deal over Batman killing someone, they didn't really play off of it in that scene. No "I tried". No "Oh God, Joker was right about me." Nothing, just "Joker caused just one of us to fall, the best of us. Blame me about those dead corrupt cops instead of the Joker, thereby screwing over our ability to work together in the future."

    With all the great work they had put into the rest of the movie, the ending came off as lazy and without thought.

  10. SPOILERS

    One last thing: why does Batman have to take the blame for the murders? Why don't they just blame it on Joker?

    That and the fact that Batman apparently killed (is this now under debate?) Two-Face after the film made a big deal about Batman not killing were two big flaws in the ending. Part of that disappointment is probably due to the fact that earlier in the movie Batman threw the one mob leader off a building from an apparently similar height and lived.

    I could be off on how big that warehouse drop was. Any of the multiple viewing people have feedback on that?

  11. Watchmen... Holy shit... Watchmen. That trailer is incredible.

    There was a trailer for Terminator also. The franchise is so iffy at this point, but the theme played, and you see Christian Bale as John Connor, and it melted my heart. It's unwise to dare to hope, but I do.

  12. I used to be one of those people who said they'd be fine with Heath in the role as long as they dubbed Mark Hamill in for the dialogue (back when it was first announced Heath would be playing the Joker). After seeing the trailers and now, finally, the movie, I've come to the conclusion that myself and everyone else who said something to that effect were being stupid. I may love Mark Hamill's portrayal of the character, but I think Heath topped him easily.

    Heath did impress, as I didn't think he could do it at all.

    He had his shortcomings, but damn, did he ever entertain.

    Fact is the movie is the best comic book film ever made and not only that it's virtually flawless in all areas. Didn't meet up with the hype? The film was perfect, I don't know how you can go beyond perfect but ok I guess it didn't

    Fact is, there are way too many comic book films to consider this the end all be all greatest.

    You want authenticity to the source material, try the original Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. It's not perfect, but nothing is.

    You want humanity, Iron Man.

    You want Batman, Burton's neo gothic flair, mixed with Danny Elfman's music, and Nicholson's Joker crafted such excellence that is hard to beat. Then you have Dark Knight. The only part of Dark Knight's score that was memorable was the Joker's little screeching guitar whenever his plans were in action.

    I can elate on more misgivings I had in the Dark Knight, but that's spoiler territory. Major spoiler territory.

    I don't see why all you guys are getting so pissed though. I'm not trashing the movie, it was really good. I went in thinking I was going to be bored out of my mind, and in that I was absolutely wrong. In the franchise, I still enjoy Batman more, but only Batman is outranking this one.

×
×
  • Create New...