Bigfoot Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 This is an interesting clip where Adam Sessler from G4TV talks with authors Lawrence Kutner and Cheryl Olson of the book Grand Theft Childhood about their research. It's interesting because they found that not only did kids show risk of getting in trouble at school/home/etc. after playing violent/mature games, but also kids show risk from not playing games at all. http://www.g4tv.com/video_detail.aspx?video_key=21264 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Samus Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 So in Theory, they are contradicing themselves??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSnowStorm Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 Wow, how truly ironic. They debate how children who play violent vidoe games are at risk for violence, and yet, children who don't play vidoe games tends to be even more violent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neonlare Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 I think they meant if children only play Mature or Violent games, and not play anything else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xenon Odyssey Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 I think they meant if children only play Mature or Violent games, and not play anything else. Right. And they never said it led them to be killers; just that they have a greater chance of getting in trouble in school, at home, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJT Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 man, its almost like people can be violent without any influence from the media. weird. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cobaltstarfire Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 It makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside that I'm right and all my teachers and TA's in this field are wrong. That'll show them for asserting something so strongly with little evidence. It's nice that this book seems to consider that maybe the parents have more than a little control over this stuff, rather than going. AHH GAMES ARE EBIL SAVE THE CHILDREN! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vivi22 Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 So in Theory, they are contradicing themselves??? No, because they make the distinction that kids who play violent video games a certain amount are more at risk for getting in trouble, but most don't get in trouble. Video games aren't the causal factor. Which means their research actually supports something that I, and I'm sure others have suspected for a long time; that video games don't cause people to be violent, but violent games do attract people with violent tendencies. I may read this book actually, since they seem to be some of the few people out there who have actually been concerned with how people actually react to violent games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.