Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This sounds good, enough for a yes definitely, BUT it was obvious to me that this sounded low quality. So I look at my winamp, and what do I see? 96kbps? Damn, I thought the minimum was 128! Well it's very noticeable.

NO until this is re-encoded.

Posted

Regardless of recording quality, this gets a no from me because of the excessive amount of bad notes throughout the whole song. It was a good attempt at reconstructing the chord progression from scratch, which I admire, but it falls short in too many places to get a yes from me. I'll post times when I'm back home, but for now:

NO

D

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...