Mordi Posted June 24, 2008 Share Posted June 24, 2008 http://www.amigaremix.com/listen/2070 Turned out better than I expected. Kind of 90ish dancey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozovian Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 First of all - 10 megs, are you nuts? Drop the bitrate to something sensible, man! Please! 1:35 before there's anything I recognize from source. A little too long, methinks. And once it really gets started, it's really not that different from source. You need to find the middle ground between original content and source. Technically, it's got a pretty good sound. Some sounds are a little too simple to sound professional, the bass being one, bass drum being another. The saw-based lead is another, tho to a lesser extent. While still on the topic of bass, this sounds a little lacking in that department. It doesn't have the weight it could have. The sound you used at 1:33 was pretty cool (the one that's not a bell-like sound). Unfortunately, it's as if a new track starts after that, having very little in common with the one before. Blending the two together more would make the track better, but I still recommend lacing the first part with source. Not bad, man. Needs more interpretation, but it sounds technically ok, and it's danceable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.