Liontamer Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Hi this is my first submission ever, so I might do things wrong, well i'll try my best to follow the instructions on the website so my remixer's name : Chalalagne My real name : Gabriel Cyr my email adress : peacefull76@hotmail.com I have not subscribed to the forum yet. If need be, just let me know and i'll do so right away. The game's name: FF6 aka FF3 in the US The tune : Epitaph This is an orchestrated version of my favorite tune from FF6/3 with a little hint of Ravel's Bolero (was'nt intended but seems to sound a bit alike). P.S. the "sml" at the end was just a way for me to separate it from the 320 kbps version and is not by any mean part of the title. Thank you for listening ! If it does not qualify, any info/feedbacks would be apreciated ! -------------------------------------------------------------- http://snesmusic.org/v2/download.php?spcNow=ff6 - "Epitaph" (ff6-309.spc) This did have some additive writing, and the tempo was slowed, but the structure sounded exactly like the original, and the mood wasn't particularly different. Loops at 1:35 (and a bunch of other points) with some more new supporting writing added each time. It was basically the same core melodic ideas with no variation/interpretation there. Expansion is a reasonably fine arrangement approach, but that's got to be in conjunction with other aspects of interpretation, IMO. The textures were decent if not 100% cohesive, but the amount of melodic repetition doesn't bear 7+ minutes by a long shot. Shorten this track, and get more interpretive with the melodies. NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkeSword Posted April 2, 2009 Share Posted April 2, 2009 Not a bad sound, but Larry's right. It's pretty much the same as the original with just a few elements added and expanded. Not that that makes for bad music, it's just not what OCR looks for. NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palpable Posted April 2, 2009 Share Posted April 2, 2009 Yeah this is too similar to the source, and on top of it, repeated a lot for its course. Even though you added new elements, the repetitions were really apparent, and this needed more of a dynamic curve to withstand such repetitions. Sound is decent, but that won't cut it. NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts