SLyGeN Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 I think the logic here is that since we switched over early, we will have saved 3 weeks' worth of power we would have used otherwise.Or something like that. That would be my guess. Logically, to save power, everyone should go to bed and wake up at an earlier time no matter what the time of year is. Of course, nobody will do that. Three weeks early seems to be pretty arbitrary to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OptimusShr Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 A lot of people doubt the energy saving claim however citing increased fuel usage and AC use during the summer. I am skeptical of the energy saving claim and think that changing the clocks is pointless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vindkast Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 Hooray, time for a higher electric bill because I have to use more energy air conditioning my apartment while I'm awake! I love conserving energy Lets just leave our clocks set back an hour all year-- then we'd never use any power at all! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G_D Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 To add to Calpis' idea of getting rid of leap year, we could totally do that, and also establish 13 four-week months if we wanted. Of course we'd have to convince about 7 billion people to go along with the idea, but I think we have enough guns and bullets to do that... Not really. All the people on this planet are controlled by less than a million authorities, I would guess. Really, it would be as simple as convincing every national government, which would just be a few thousand authority figures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.