Jump to content

Protricity

Members
  • Posts

    1,309
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Protricity

  1. Pretty impressive considering the first version of this song I heard a year ago.

    Looks like 'yes' but I'll have to listen more.

    Way way better than the original.. but it still has the problem the original had. (Note: by original, I mean v 1.0 of this song)

    A. Not too much going on.

    B. FL N00b Quality

    C. Ugly keys/notation in a few sections.

    Very nice improvement, unfortunately our standards went up since :(

    NO

  2. We'll need someone to do research on this one for sure. Sounds like a mass-rip. You got the off key chords, the unfitting drumloops, and general overdone reverb and bad mastering.

    giving this the benifit of the doubt: The lead does not follow the key of the brass. Also, short and lame fade out ending etc

    NO

  3. The whole 1:00 part has really poor key attention. Very messy.

    Violins don't sound real at all. Lots of repeating. Original melody is followed pretty much exactly save for some poor chords. More repeating.

    Please have more attention to keys and dont use high quality samples to carry a song. EDIT: Perhaps the strings are real after all. THey dont sound real. Anyway, that was not the reason I gave it a

    NO

  4. Oh my fucking god.

    This is so damned cool.

    Holy Shit.

    God I hope this doesn't break any guidelines.

    HELL DAMNIT WTF GRRRRR STFU NO

    Potential Problems:

    This was gotten from a C64 game?

    Whats the deal with the ripped off vocal sections from that one 80s song.. uh.. forget the name?

  5. hahaha. This is pretty fun. HAHAHA

    HA HA HA

    HAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA etc

    anyway. Its fun because of the multitude of drumloops and sound effects. Very creative way to make a song out of an 8 second riff.

    This is a tough decision. I'm on the side of NO due to the excess reliance on sfx/loops

    Could have been much better. Go for your own drums next time.

    I liked it but NO

  6. decent drums, lots of sound effects.

    Problem here is total lack of appreciation for chords, arrangement, and ofcourse rearrangement.

    A lo-fi redux of the original with different instruments. This would have been perfect for metroid prime. Ending is really abrupt and weird.

    Cool ambience, but lacking in all else.

    Keep at it.

    NO

  7. I remember the original well enough. It was basically this without the preset synths and simple drum.

    You need to go for more. More means more in the way of melodic arrangement. Cut synths and stomp drums might be enough for some people, but not for oc. We're about rearrangement, remixing.

    NO

  8. now i know not to miss this show anymore. hilarious! :lol:

    It's not usually that random, by the way. Just giving you a heads up - then again, this could set a new direction for the show, given the popularity it's gotten as a result ;-).

    A new direction? Danny B calling like 15 times? No thank you! :lol:

    BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT SMART

  9. Pretty weak, yes. You got the drumloop and single instruments going on. Loops twice and ends unconvincingly.

    Just go for more. Elaborate on melody, use different instruments. Dont stick to minimalism.

    I must say though. Theres a real good flow. I'm pretty borderline as it is.

    NO

    Due to uncertainty and vast moral dillema, I'm gonna have to reconsider this one. My NO was not definite.

    I'll listen more.

    Ok. I liked the style in this song very much, especially with what was going on later. The drums change enough. To add much more to this song would probably kill the style.

    I've listened to this like 30 times now. I'm right on the border.

    Took a while but I'm pretty into it now. Sad that this song will never see the light of day in OCR. Cool stuff, I'm keepin it.

    YES

×
×
  • Create New...