Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hmm, note for note intro. Lets see where it goes.

0:30 Note for note still.

0:40 Note for note still.

0:50 Note for note still.

1:00 Note for note still.

1:10 Note for note still.

1:20 Note for note still.

1:30 Note for note still.

1:40 Note for note still.

ok, thats all I need to hear.

NO

no spc rips please.

Posted

past the fact that this is too close to the original I offer the following:

the bass at 1:20 sounds slightly dissonant..

the brass section at 1:40 (french horn?) sounds quite nice.

the lead instrument is a little too dry. More dynamic range would be nice.

bass back in at 2:10ish sounds dissonant again. Too characteristic?

The stabby lines around 2:30 - 3:00 are a little boring without much to

back them up. The pingpong echo is kinda neat, but could be more

defined. just sounds flat.

The lead reintroduced in the next section, again, a little lifeless. The

violin in the background has an odd sample loop point, might try replacing

that with another soundfont, assuming that's what you're using.

However, being that this is note for note the spc, with nicer instruments,

I have to vote

NO

Develop the themes or maybe work a medley together, and then you'll

have something more fitting of our guidelines.

Posted

well the bass at 1:20 is just really muddy because it's like chords at a really deep register. Just comes across really cloudy.

Anyway, most of this has already been said, so I won't rehash. But it does seem more like an instrumental update than an arrangement or interpretation. Gonna have to go with the rest of the guys with:

NO

D

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...