Jump to content

Time to upgrade the comp, best options for VST?


Recommended Posts

So my birthday came around early this month and I've been wanting to upgrade my amazingly underpowered comp for a long time.

so i was wondering...

To run a higher number of VSTs, which is more beneficial, more RAM or a faster processor?

because i was under the impression RAM controlled everything and hemo said that vsts are more based on the processor whereas samples are based on ram.

so what is the actual truth about this?

cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well.. that's kind of a vague question. Some plugins, like Stylus RMX, take up a big chunk of RAM just to load the wrapper. This is mostly the case with complex sampler plugins or GUI-heavy plugins, even before you load any patches. So, you're always going to want at LEAST 1.5gb of RAM even if you don't plan on using a lot of big samples - I think 2gb is really a minimum at this point if you're going to be doing big projects.

If you DO intend to do a lot of heavy-duty sampling then RAM becomes even more important. DFD (direct from disk) streaming will only get you so far. At the same time, you're also going to need a powerful CPU to play back lots of voices in real time, streamed from your HD or not. If you don't think you're going to be doing any sampling at all, and you're strictly dealing with synths and tiny oneshots, then RAM won't be as big of an issue, but CPU will be because it will usually put more strain on your processor to generate a complex waveform from a synth than to simply play back a complex recorded waveform.

I'd say they're both equally important overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for the insight zircon ;)

I was planning to be using mostly cpu-intensive vsts such as V-Station and z3ta+, Absynth, that kinda thing, not sample-based vsts like Atmosphere.

so in that case, would a better processor be more beneficial?

Yeah, if that's the kind of thing you're going to be doing, you DEFINITELY want a good CPU. I have Absynth and z3ta+ and they can eat up processor power like crazy depending on the complexity of the patch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have an amazingly underpowered computer already, are you still able to upgrade it or shouldn't you consider buying a new one?

Or are you going to take the new mobo + new RAM + new CPU route?

To me, it is as follows:

1 gb RAM is twice as big as 512 mb

An XP3200+ is only a fraction faster than an XP3000+.

If the latter means you can only have 512 mb, it's not a wise choice, if you catch my drift.

Also, look into the Dual Core machines. When your host/sequencer can handle it, it's pretty cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...