Jump to content

Liontamer

Judges
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    14,224

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    140

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Liontamer

  1. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  2. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  3. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  4. Liontamer
    You can answer it in the thread with the questions above or send a PM to chanq with your answers. The free survey tool maxed out on responses.
  5. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  6. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  7. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  8. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  9. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  10. Liontamer
    Go for it!
  11. Liontamer
    I neglected to take it myself, so I took it.
  12. Liontamer
    I was comparing this to both OceansAndrew and UV Sir J as well once the guitar stuff kicked in, i.e. this was good fun and puts a smile on your face! Nice work, Corentin, welcome aboard! YES
  13. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  14. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  15. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  16. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  17. Liontamer
    This seems like a perfectly valid cover approach to me when it comes to OCR's standards. The melody's straightforward, but all of the supporting instrumentation around it is wholly original. You can go melodically conservative and still have a valid arrangement approach if there's different or expansive original writing integrated with it. This would have been approved in the oldest days of OCR when it had a lower bar for the level of interpretation/personalization. This does go well in the right direction, but I thought it still lacked some polish and complexity in the presentation. I'd argue it wasn't complex enough, so it felt like the track was texturally pretty empty and underdeveloped, and that's the biggest issue I had I'd argue this would have been better with more melodic interpretation, and while there was variation in the instrumentation for the lead (e.g. 1:09 with the new sounds for the doubled leads), the melody itself was very by-the-numbers. Outlier or not, I don't think Chimpa going YES is against the spirit of the Submissions Standards, but I do think, while this is in the right direction of personalizing a cover-style arrangement, more melodic and/or textural development would make this more likely to meet our arrangement criteria and stand apart more from the original song. Good stuff so far though. NO (resubmit)
  18. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  19. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  20. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  21. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  22. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  23. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  24. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  25. Liontamer
    What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
×
×
  • Create New...