Jump to content

diy & experimental electronic music


analoq
 Share

Recommended Posts

AS LONG AS THE SOURCE IS IDENTIFIABLE AND DOMINANT
Therein lies the issue. Concrete, microtonal, algorithmic composition, circuit-bending and other electronic techniques don't particularly lend themselves to the pop melodies and rhythms of the video game genre. Recognizability is necessary for OCR but that limitation is not conducive to experimental music when the whole point is not to have limits.

Not that there's any shame in that. Reworking music from a niche genre into far removed styles is plenty esoteric by itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DrumUltimA made an all-percussion mix that passed

When was this? I'd love to hear it. However, the only percussion-only track that comes to mind off the top of my head is the Chrono Trigger World Map music in 65 million BC.

Do you think you could make an experimental (whatever that means to you, I suppose) track to submit here? Maybe then we'd have a better idea of how you see it working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's exactly what he remixed - you'll hear it when it gets posted.

I'm still pretty sure experimental stuff could easily get posted here. Look at BT's latest album. VERY experimental - nothing is in 4/4 across the whole thing and just about everything is insanely chopped, warped, and bent to hell. Massive 15 minute soundscapes. But there are still melodies of sorts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Therein lies the issue. Concrete, microtonal, algorithmic composition, circuit-bending and other electronic techniques don't particularly lend themselves to the pop melodies and rhythms of the video game genre. Recognizability is necessary for OCR but that limitation is not conducive to experimental music when the whole point is not to have limits.

Not that there's any shame in that. Reworking music from a niche genre into far removed styles is plenty esoteric by itself.

While I most certainly does not think BT is experimental, zircon has a valid point. It's possible to work in motifs from sources and like Vagrance said, you could probably do well in look around for sources suitable to your intended "style".

I bet it's harder than making you know trance or metal but it's absolutely possible and I, for one, is trying to create a remix in a very experimental style.. We'll see when time allows!

Noise or really twisted breakcore would probably work well if you borrow distinct rhythmic patterns from a source and maybe simple bassline chord structure in a song without melody. More algorithmic compositions a la Stockhausen and Cage are probably not possible because the whole point of these is to free them from human thinking. Thus using such a style for an arrangement is not only hard but quite stupid :) Circuitbending, microtonal and in some cases algorithmic (depending on what algorithms you are actually using and for what) is still possible. The limit is ofc that it's hard to make an all out circuit bent track with JUST noise. The key issue is finding the balance.

Ah well, hope we've sparked some interest for these kinda things anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet it's harder than making you know trance or metal but it's absolutely possible

I never said it was impossible just not particularly conducive. I think our disagreement is more fundamental than the angle you are coming at:

I, for one, is trying to create a remix in a very experimental style..

And I'll respect that as long as you respect your artistic vision. The moment you compromise for the sake of recognizability or any scrutiny on what you perceive a remix should be, then you are no longer making an experimental remix -- you are making a normal remix with some experimental techniques thrown in. And I don't call that avant-garde, I call that a gimmick.

So, best of luck to you on treading that fine line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said it was impossible just not particularly conducive. I think our disagreement is more fundamental than the angle you are coming at:

And I'll respect that as long as you respect your artistic vision. The moment you compromise for the sake of recognizability or any scrutiny on what you perceive a remix should be, then you are no longer making an experimental remix -- you are making a normal remix with some experimental techniques thrown in. And I don't call that avant-garde, I call that a gimmick.

So, best of luck to you on treading that fine line.

Now I feel the pressure :D

We'll see how it turns out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm rather intrigued by the Axis64. A while back, I programmed the Axis layout for my Monome (tilting it diagonally) to get an idea of how it plays. The chords and scales do make sense but it's certainly a different animal -- no amount of keyboard experience will help you with that thing.

They're coming out with an Axis49 soon. If it approaches affordability I'm going to have to consider it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hot professor at some college has a ten-part(!) video series on her modifying the Axis to fit a different kind of scale.

I guess I would like to see some statements about whether that particular layout is the best way to arrange the notes. Or something. I don't know nearly enough theory to make a judgment, but I don't like that C-Thru music has just thrown up a website with this totally strange animal and expects someone to buy it.

Also, check this

.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hot professor at some college has a ten-part(!) video series on her modifying the Axis to fit a different kind of scale.

I couldn't help but watch all (12) of these. Very interesting and she is rather captivating...

I don't know nearly enough theory to make a judgment, but I don't like that C-Thru music has just thrown up a website with this totally strange animal and expects someone to buy it.

I'm a proponent of the idea. There are physical limitations in what sort of keyboard layout you could use for a piano, harpsichord, organ due to the mechanical/acoustic nature of the instruments. With electronics, you don't have those limitations so I'm glad C-Thru is among the companies out there trying something different. I wish there was more competition among alternative controllers, bring those prices down.

I guess I would like to see some statements about whether that particular layout is the best way to arrange the notes. Or something.

In the Jordan Rudess Axis videos he says there are some things you can do with that layout you can't do on a regular keyboard -- and vice versa. I don't think there's a good answer to your question; does a guitar use a better note layout than a piccolo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a proponent of the idea. There are physical limitations in what sort of keyboard layout you could use for a piano, harpsichord, organ due to the mechanical/acoustic nature of the instruments. With electronics, you don't have those limitations so I'm glad C-Thru is among the companies out there trying something different. I wish there was more competition among alternative controllers, bring those prices down.

I think you misunderstood. I'm very happy to see this product, and I'm excited by the idea of pushing boundaries in general. Like I mentioned, I'm wrestling with the ideas of what I can do with it. However, with this controller trying to forge such new ground, I feel the burden of proof ought to be on them in order to allow us to see for ourselves what we can do with it. In other words, let us try before we buy.

In the Jordan Rudess Axis videos he says there are some things you can do with that layout you can't do on a regular keyboard -- and vice versa. I don't think there's a good answer to your question; does a guitar use a better note layout than a piccolo?

Fair enough, but what I guess I'm saying here is that I'd like to understand what drove the designers to arrange the notes the way they did. For example, a regular 1-3-5 chord can be played with a finger, but a scale is less intuitive. From a theory perspective, what drove them to put the notes where they did? And as you said, unlike a guitar or piccolo, there were no physical limitations about what went where, so they were free to arrange the notes in what I imagine was the way that (theoretically) would allow for optimum music composition and performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The inventory of the layout, Peter Davies, sells his own version of the controller: http://www.theshapeofmusic.com/

According to the site he's been researching this stuff since the early 80s. You could try emailing him and asking if he's written any research papers relevant to his layout.

Though, if you play a bit of piano and guitar I don't think anything needs to be explained. It has the action of a keyboard instrument but with chord shapes and scales like a guitar but using more logical patterns. Any musician can see the layout is clever, at least.

Whether it's optimal for composition/performance/etc, again, who can say?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though, if you play a bit of piano and guitar I don't think anything needs to be explained. It has the action of a keyboard instrument but with chord shapes and scales like a guitar but using more logical patterns. Any musician can see the layout is clever, at least.

I don't know the first thing about guitar. Could you explain a little more about that part please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always been kind of interested in a more intuitive mapping for typing keyboard to MIDI. Seems like most arrangements assign white notes to ZXCVBN and QWERTY with black notes on ASDFGH and 123456. I think this could be done better... though I don't know how, offhand. For people like me, that type ridiculously fast, I could imagine some cool musical applications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know the first thing about guitar. Could you explain a little more about that part please?

The similarity is in the sense that on guitar, there are certain chord shapes and scale patterns along the frets that can be moved horizontally and to some extend vertically along the fretboard for transposition. The Axis does the same, but more fluently.

I've always been kind of interested in a more intuitive mapping for typing keyboard to MIDI. Seems like most arrangements assign white notes to ZXCVBN and QWERTY with black notes on ASDFGH and 123456. I think this could be done better... though I don't know how, offhand. For people like me, that type ridiculously fast, I could imagine some cool musical applications.

If you come up with some ideas, do share them. I've written some software previously along these lines:

I got an octave and a half and assign the bottom manual to an arpeggiator and I'm able to perform a simple piano piece. Geeky fun, but not exactly a revolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why do these people have a zillion bucks for a great modular

and days of time to figure this kind of shit out

but always, always, always fail to record their work with a decent harddiskrecorder/audio-interface/anything that's not a camera mic

ffffffffffuuuuuuuuuu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Back to the Axis64...

I'm rather intrigued by the Axis64. A while back, I programmed the Axis layout for my Monome (tilting it diagonally) to get an idea of how it plays.

I made a video demonstrating this:

Also, the aforementioned layout inventor Peter Davies is on YouTube, can't help but post this video of his:

cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...