djpretzel Posted August 3, 2002 Posted August 3, 2002 That is my new link for my song, I had to do the whole underscore thing to get it working for my friends, so I was thinking maybe that's why you haven't emailed me back with comments about this song yet.... -Paul... erehm... I mean Vicks Cornatto.... note: I think we'd need a higher quality version if we wanted to post, but please evaluate based off what he gave us (actually sounded pretty good to me)
orkybash Posted August 3, 2002 Posted August 3, 2002 Well, I think the samples need better quality (they sound a bit harsh and thin now), but other than that I like this arrangement. It's formula techno for most of it, but there are some interesting ideas as well. Vote: YES BTW, there's a high quality (128 kbit) version of this at VGmix. Go to http://www.vgmix.com/songview.php?songid=883 .
Saunders Posted August 6, 2002 Posted August 6, 2002 I'm don't like the lead. Not at all. It's just sickly sounding, kinda breathy/whiny. Although 0:43 brings something a bit better. It's catchy, although if it's supposed to be a dance tune it needs more bass. Way more. It makes it sound empty. Okay, it's 1:50 now, and I'm getting sick of the lead. It was whiny. Now it's 2:05 though, and this piano thing is pretty cool. Oh there's that weird synth thing again, it's not quite annoying, but it verges on it. Ew, around 2:45 i was hearing something that sounded like mp3 click, yucky. Okay overall, I liked the arrangement, but I think this mix could benefit from a sample overhaul, and the it needs to be given a nice strong bass line. Vote: No
Antonio Pizza Posted August 6, 2002 Posted August 6, 2002 Yes, but make sure you post the 128kbps version. It still sounds kinda scratchy/muffled, but that's okay. It's not that bad and it's not enough to negate the song as a whole. Posties!!!! *Dan Forden pops out of the corner*
m68030 Posted August 6, 2002 Posted August 6, 2002 A nice arrangement. I dont think we should let remixes at this low samplerate/bitrate on the site. We've got a quality to keep up. I'm voting YES only if we get it at at least 44/128.
orkybash Posted August 7, 2002 Posted August 7, 2002 I'm voting YES only if we get it at at least 44/128. You *did* see the 128 kbit version I posted a link to, right?
Recommended Posts