sephfire Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 Some of you may recall that I usually post a "teaser" WIP for remixes I've just started working on. It's to give you of an idea of the sound I'm going for and what you can look forward to. Here's my latest, by popular request. http://www.sephfire.com/music/angel_smile.mp3 It's a somewhat different sound for me, but I've been trying to experiment lately. I'm sure everyone's getting tired of the timpanis, yes? Keep in mind, it's just a teaser. The arrangement is non-existent, the source-material is pretty obscured. It'll get better, I promise. It's going to be a remix of "Angel Gifts," by the way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WesPip Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 WE KNEW KATAMARI WOULD WIN. WE HAD FAITH IN YOU, little PRINCE. Though I'd have preferred Lonely Rolling Star, this is still a great sight to behold. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BardicKnowledge Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 Looking forward to the rest of it, Sephfire! Have you considered a little more reverb/delay on the bass to make it similarly spacey to the crystal reverb? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sephfire Posted September 19, 2007 Author Share Posted September 19, 2007 You know, that's not a bad idea. I'll play around with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unsung Plumber Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 OOh, can't belive I forgot about this. I like it, and after :56 needs to be expanded on seeing that its so good. if your on AIM, shoot me a IM and I'll see if i can't help in some way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sephfire Posted October 2, 2007 Author Share Posted October 2, 2007 Touched it up some more and added a new section at the end. http://www.sephfire.com/music/angel_smile.mp3 Be honest: are you guys feeling this? It's a pretty different sound for me and I'm kinda just stabbing in the dark with ideas and instruments to see how they fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avaris Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 I really like the feel of it. It's very ambient in structure and sound though. There is nothing that really jumps out as the lead. Everything sounds pretty distant or muffled right now. In different places I've read when you are going for a really moody track such as this it's always good to have at least 1-3 dry elements to give the piece a sense of balance. Also with so many background elements it might help to stereo image a few of them. Maybe try to set up the stereo imager as a send with the low -20 and the high at +35. Have th cutt off around 225hz - 400hz. Feed different amounts of the background elements to help give some of them more space and overall make the track feel bigger and carry more presence. It's kind of an unorthodox method but IMO seems to work pretty good in Reason with certain tracks. It's really relaxing and sounds like it could be a really good mix with some more tweaking and attention to detail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unsung Plumber Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 I'll be honest and say I like it, there are a couple of problems, but it is a cool feel you got going. I think Avaris is right, it does seem as though there is no lead, so I'd give his idea a shot. EDIT: oh yeah, and the bass lead needs more thud, Fo Realz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweex Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 A quick observation: It's low-end heavy. With all the verb, it's losing it's Frequency spread very quickly. One thing that might help would be to turn on the "high shelf" in the Combi Mastering Suite at the top of your rack. It won't be much, but it could help expand and open up the sound a lot. Also, if you're using the RV-7 reverb, it's been my experience that it is one of the main reasons for songs to lose a lot of high end. I feel the RV7000 is much better about that and it gives you more control, not to mention presets that can really sound awesome for you to choose from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sephfire Posted October 21, 2007 Author Share Posted October 21, 2007 Ugh. Sorry nothing's been happening with this. I've had writer's block for months. Hopefully I'll get something good going soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirRus Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 seph! whats up bro. I have to say, I was not expecting this sound when I hit the link, but I'm impressed. I dig it and really want you to finish it, this is my kind of music, and makes great backgrouhd music to zone out to while studying or driving. A very different type of music than I'm used to from you - although I have been known to study while listening to above the rising falls, esp. when tests are right around the corner, gives a good sense of premonition, ha. Hope you and yours are doing well, and good talking to you again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inv1ctus Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 sephire, not sure im worthy to comment on ure stuff, it blows mine out of the water but i have to say its good material so far. I would say a more developed piano melody would be cool. It seems to be the dominant instrument in this piece, so i would say make it shine. Even maybe where you ended you could start a breakdown with a developed melody. Also, this seems like the kind of song where a key change might take place later after it has developed, i dunno something to think about. im liking it tho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sephfire Posted November 1, 2007 Author Share Posted November 1, 2007 I like the idea of developing the piano side of things. It's worth a shot at least. It's like a mental brick wall every time I try to sit down and work on this thing. Writer's block blows. http://www.sephfire.com/music/angel_smile.mp3 As before, the mixing is almost completely ignored so far. I'm just struggling to find a good arrangement to go with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inv1ctus Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 i love the positive, liquid feel of this song. And you know what the eq ain't that bad. Its really got that dj Sammy feel to it. Granted it probably needs more tlc in that department but thats just trivial. I love those reverse piano effects. For some reason i really really want a reverse cymbal to introduce that first drum part. Maybe some panning with the treble percussion? Also maybe some lower frequencies on the bass, or at least introducing it at lower frequencies and then building to the higher treble point would be cool IMO. i cant be of much help other than that, good luck on figuring out where to go next Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Revoredo Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 The mix begins great, I liked the synths and the piano. Later it seems to come a "Sytrus" synth or somthing, and then the drums. I still don't like very much that bass line.. it kinda spoils the great atmosphere you had built up. Um, I liked the first drum part, but I would put instead a longer and more "hard/distorted" snare drum, maybe like this I would even say that you could try addding some "mixing" to the drums (maybe like this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gbum-dJTuI )I would say the biggest danger for you here is to fall on repetitiveness, although I've liked the mix so far.. Maybe you could try implementing different sections and such. As for the good things: I really loved the synthesizer atmosphere you built, the piano and the beats. It's really chilling, and for sure is a song I'd put on my mp3. It's great stuff what you got here. Sounds awesome Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unsung Plumber Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 Man, I don't know what it is, but I cannot formulate any comments on this or any other wip right now. All I can do is show my support for ya Dan. Keep at it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anosou Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 *anso totally bumps this* so, first off props for making a katamari remix. I was planning on getting a first-posted on that eventually but you will def beat me to it I guess I'll do We <3 Katamari instead. So, for the constructive critcism: The bass synth is really the only thing that's giving away this as an Angels Gift-remix. While it's VERY important that it's there, the bass doesn't sound all that good. It's too harsh to fit in the overall soundscape, use a softer bass and layer it with some mid-synth lead maybe? Try different things until you feel it fits. Maybe it's just my personal opinion though. The drums during that part is very muddy even though they are interesting, MCLass EQ is your friend As always with EQ, REMOVE unwanted frequencies, never add. Everything that isn't crucial for the sound can with great success be lowered or removed. After this part the drum work is just top-class. Great work on that. It's groovy like hell. To make this pass arrangement wise you need some more easy-to-notice references to the original. Try adapting the guitar arpeggio from the beginning of the song but with another instrument. Since Angels Gift is a song that mostly is about the general sound of the instruments it's important to catch every aspect of the actual melodies. Also, more automated-filter-freq-synths please ) Good work, keep it up man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theory of N Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 *bumpage and stuff* *Ansownt©* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anosou Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 *Ansownt©* I'll totally use that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.