Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/24/2017 in all areas

  1. Having not heard the original version since you originally posted it it's hard to draw direct comparisons, but many of the prior issues still remain. I still believe it's far too long. Right now you're still recycling the same segments over and over with very little variation, outside of instrument swaps. The brief flute solo at 4:42 was a nice change, and following it up with those piano variations was great, but you quickly went back into the same cut-and-paste segments, just with different instruments. I don't have a ton of time to go over everything, but I'll outline a few specific points: The good: - A lot of the solo/variation/etc writing is pretty solid, even if it's not particularly complex. -While there aren't a lot of dynamic variances, the mixing itself isn't bad. -The intro is still really nice. It had a fair amount of build-up and left me wondering where you would go. The bad: -The length of the song does not match the amount of content. I'd again suggest severely cutting the length of the song and focusing on the arrangement. -A lot of the instrumentation is still very robotic. Some of it could be attributed to lower quality samples, or perhaps not using the samples correctly. For example, staccatos at 3:28. As they're taking over the lead, it feels kind of odd writing it like that. A more flowing sustained section might work better, especially if you happened to have a well-timed brass section swell up alongside it rather than simply chugging along with the backbeat. -The song still ends abruptly. Even a fade out would be preferable to that.
    3 points
  2. Today I found an old USB stick filled with OC remixes back from early 2007. Good to see that 10 years later the community is still alive and well. Very random topic but I just wanted to say thank you to all the people who created these fantastic remixes back in the day and are still doing it today! Keep up the good work!
    1 point
  3. Wow, it's been a fast two years... @Kat and @timaeus222 have said what needs to be said so i'll keep this short. All previous comments that were made in my post still stand. Maybe some things were changed as you say but unless someone is intimately familiar with each of your versions the changes that were made are not going to be noticed. Honestly I think you worked yourself into a corner with what is probably a massive, cumbersome project. If it takes hours of work to make what ends up being barely noticeable changes then your best bet would be either start over or keep what's working and cut the rest. In this case I would recommend you keep the intro and give yourself one entire stating of the source to work with. That means cutting roughly 9-10 minutes of what's here. BUT with that entire chunk of source you have left try to reinterpret it in various different ways. Change some things, play with it and see if anything sparks your own creativity. You can use other areas of the timeline in your DAW as scrap work to use later on if that helps. Once you have some ideas down then you'll have a remix that is much more engaging and not just something that sounds like it's on endless repeat.
    1 point
  4. Before I even say anything else, didn't @Kat suggest that you shorten the track to focus it more? @Garpocalypse also hinted at it. It looks either the same length or a bit longer. So, you should read back through the feedback more carefully, and note patterns in what people are saying. Consider the issues previously at hand: mechanical sequencing, or lacking expression, or both too long for the amount of arrangement development it has too repetitive (similar partwriting with a lot of copy/paste, with swapped instruments) You should really ask yourself, "did I actually take these feedback into account, or do I just think I did?" Be honest with yourself and really think about it. Some newer composers lead themselves to believe that they took certain feedback into account, when they only believe they did and actually objectively did not. That, and it's been 2 years. Again, I haven't listened to this newer version yet, but I want you to focus your attention on this concern and to think about this.
    1 point
  5. It's a bit crazy, isn't it? Last time I met up with a djpretzel we both had that moment of "let's see, we've known each other... how many years now? OVER 15?!" A few of us insane ones from back then are still puttering and releasing new tracks too, and I'm one of 'em, so I guess on behalf of the OCR veterans... you're welcome. The really awesome part is how many guys from this community have gone on to become actual game composers and are now making a living doing it. I'm not personally among those ranks - I found I'm a much better remixer than a composer - but just look at Big Giant Circles, Zircon... in fact right now I'm checking out the preview to Wilbert Roget's Call of Duty WW2 soundtrack! It's a cool feeling, being proud of your friends and their accomplishments. It's certainly an awesome community for that.
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...