Okay, no no no, bad, bad Kamoh!
Please understand that you just ennumerated 4 awards for the same stat - wins. Which means on any given week, one person wins the first three (*coughchokeJDcoughgag) and then on special weeks, one person wins all four. This is dumb.
Award #1: Most wins for the week (with an added bonus if that player went 100% that week, and played all scheduled games).
Award #2: Most improved player has the highest differential of wins this week minus wins last week, divided by total games played.
Award #3: Dark Horse winner is the lowest ranked player that week to have at least 1 win against a player in the top 5 (3?) (2?) of that week.
Award #4: The anti-award is given to the person with the lowest differential (presumably large negative number) using the same stat as Award #2, or Biggest Fall Award.
There. Now that I went to all that trouble, Kamoh won't use 'em.
Oh, uh, the All-Star idea seems pretty shiny to me, though.
Basically what I want to do here is have the three players with the most awards be in that playoff week I was talking about. Each award is the same value - for now.
Top Score:
-Best Score in One Week
-Best Score in Four Weeks
100%:
-6 wins/1 week
-12 wins/2 weeks
-18 wins/3 weeks
-24 wins/4 weeks
Most Improved:
-White Knight: Greatest Positional Gain in one week.
-Black Knight: Highest (points earned)*(their score - your score).
Other Ideas:
-King's Toilet: Outstanding exploitation of the rules.
-Swiss Trap: 6 draws/1 week.
comments?
we still have time.