Jago Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 Your thoughts? http://www.pianoteq.com/ The price is steep, though. Ouch! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollgagh Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 I know what I'm gonna be torrenting later today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinewav Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 ...... Wow... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazygecko Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 Honestly, not everyone needs this stuff. Unless you are a very accomplished pianist who is concerned for the most convincing sound possible, and for some reason you don't have access to an actual piano with decent recording capabilities, a cheaper or even free sample set will suit your needs just fine. Contrary to what some people seem to think, bigger and badder software will not compensate for your own shortcomings as a producer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zircon Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 Nah, I disagree Gecko. If you're doing any kind of music where you need realistic piano - eg. any sort of solo piano piece, concertos, soundtrack music - the difference between free and higher quality samples is pretty obvious. Plus the advantage of Pianoteq is that it's physically modeled... it has virtually no RAM requirement and can be tweaked in tone. The same can't be said for samples. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dhsu Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 For anyone who knows my production process, would this be an appropriate piece of software for me to get? For example, could I run my MIDIs through the standalone program and automatically get something fairly realistic as output? If so, this just might be worth my while. It would certainly cost less than buying a grand piano and the necessary recording equipment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceansAndrew Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 grab the demo and check it out; it works amazingly. Beautiful sound. Time to start saving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrototypeRaptor Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 this is impressive...I just hope that this "breakthrough" will eventually work its way over to orchestral instruments...*happily imagines a physically modeled trumpet that actually sounds real* I guess that the more complex (?) tone of a brass instrument is what keeps this from happening...oh well. I can always dream, right? Whatever the case, this is a find. Nice work Jago! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zircon Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Physically modeled trumpets have already been done... http://wallanderinstruments.com/ There's another PM piano also; http://www.truepianos.com/ As well as a semi-PM orchestra; http://synful.com/ etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrototypeRaptor Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 Knew about those...just didn't really "count" them. XD (yeah, I'm sad) Synful is not that great, imo, it really needs better samples to be manipulated, and wallander instruments are SO expensive as to be out of my budget almost entirely. (Well, so are all of the instruments in this "4th generation") Sigh. We all need live personal orchestras, ya know? Like Mannheim Steamroller... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jago Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share Posted April 15, 2009 Pianoteq has been updated, and it's quite an update! The price is still steep, though. But for existing customers, the update is free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaelitioN Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 I undertsand the convenience of physical modeling compared to huge sample sets , but something sounds fake when I listen to the demo songs compared to Ivory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jennerstein Posted May 3, 2009 Share Posted May 3, 2009 One thing that impressed me about Pianoteq's demo (and that ultimately lead me to purchasing it), was the fact that it's a virtual instrument based on modeling, not sampling. Pianoteq, in my opinion, really captures the feel of playing a real piano. This has to do with the fact that with modeling, the virtual instrument isn't limited to triggering samples based on velocity hits. Ivory has four to ten velocity layers, depending on the piano sounds and instrument settings you use. Pianoteq plays back the sound based on its model, which means that there is a theoretical limit of 128 different velocities (128 the maximum amount allowed with MIDI format). My main instrument is the piano, and playing Pianoteq felt quite a bit different than my Yamaha MotifES. It was easier to play expressively, especially when playing trills or accents. Another advantage that I find with Pianoteq is that it's only 20 megabytes. When compared to these massive sample libraries out there, it's like the virtual instrument equivalent of a Future Crew or Andromeda demo. I've been able to get it running on my MSI netbook if I turn down the sampling rate, and latency is still less than 10ms, which is amazing. -J Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.