Palpable Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 previous decision I believe this is the same as the last version, except with better production. I'll give a full vote later but it seemed over 50% usage and good enough production to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceansAndrew Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 I still think the intro is a bit long, but the song itself is kickass and the source seems definitely above the cutoff. Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DragonAvenger Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 I definitely applaud your commitment to getting this through and revisiting it so many times. I think at this point it finally is showing the right amount of awesomes. YES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liontamer Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 Wow, the shrill lead at 3:13-3:31 & 4:15-4:34 was annoying as hell. The mixing still wasn't great during some of the densest parts, but the parts were cleaner and distinguishable for the most part. The overall balance was a HUGE improvement, and I could actually listen to this nearly all the way without something needlessly attacking my ears or sounding like mud. That said, those shrill synths were annoying. At the end of the day, I can live with them, as much as I think they mess up the piece when they're in play. The arrangement wasn't in question, and the variations of the source were handled very, very well. There's not too, too much to this theme, so to be able to get this much mileage and substance out of it was excellent. The track still felt a little long, but the positives are definitely outweighing the negatives now. 4th time's a charm, Michael. Your persistence and willingness to rethink some of the things that were hampering this really paid off, and you have a much more cohesive and capably produced arrangement. Definitely hope to hear more from you. YES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palpable Posted November 14, 2011 Author Share Posted November 14, 2011 Oh I never actually made that full vote. I've listened to this song a lot and helped Mike a bit with critique, and he rose to the occasion each time. This is a marked improvement over previous submissions and I'm happy to pass it. I just see Mike getting better and better at what he does and I'm looking forward to more of his work. YES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palpable Posted May 1, 2012 Author Share Posted May 1, 2012 He sent a 192kbps version: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts