Jump to content

Liontamer   Judges ⚖️

  • Posts

    15,137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    175

Everything posted by Liontamer

  1. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  2. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  3. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  4. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  5. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  6. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  7. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  8. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  9. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  10. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  11. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  12. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  13. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  14. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  15. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  16. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  17. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  18. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  19. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  20. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  21. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  22. The way to my heart is house. :-) This deal is thumpin’ and bumpin’! Around 2:48 seemed to be a handoff from LANparty to Theology with the backing going to a different style. To me, that section felt less cohesive, though the chorus section at 3:50 was more unified and then the rest of the presentation was on solid ground. Would have liked more variation melodically or sonically with the lead, though I realize that wouldn’t fit with the gimmick of having the same lead then having different sets of accompaniment/backing, so it is what it is. This one’s an example where the interpretation comes more from the textures and what’s surrounding the melody, which is totally valid (and it’s not like the melody on piano has 0 interpretation, it was just more limited/repetitive). Nice job beefing up your collaborative take on this. :-) YES
  23. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  24. What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix.
  25. I enjoyed the overall dynamics of this as the track gradually rose in tension, complexity, and interpretation. Excellent way to start with the core source theme and branch out, which made winding back to the arranged melody at 3:21 all the more satisfying. :-) The airier guitar lead at 4:00 was a beautifully melancholy way to finish it, and now I'm wanting to hear another variation of this source done in that style as another fork in the road! Nice work, Juan! YES
×
×
  • Create New...