Jump to content

PROTO·DOME

Members
  • Posts

    1,684
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PROTO·DOME

  1. Truly, without the stubbornness of the standards here at OCR I would not be the musician I am today.

    Same here. OCR is such a good place to develop as a musician. Also, you're definintely one of the "next-gen" remixers (I dunno, it's funny how new remixers sort of come in waves). By 2012 you'll be an established front-pager. (Panel is slow as hell) ;D

  2. protodome mk 2
    protOSdome artistic license cmd window 4.6.7.9.006

    //||<<CN</X__$$\|||<<£YY\PROTODOMEMK0000001bootSEQ//:

    C:\creativity.dll

    >>BADDIRECTORY

    C:\midiripGOGO.dll

    >>GOOD

    //:MUSICGENERATE: PKMNreMIX00001233

    .....................................

    >>GOOD

    //:ASSIGNINGTITLETOreMIXid:00001233

    ...............................................

    "A TOUCH OF NO(resub) COAST POK$@ÆMON & FUTURE PERFECT: WALKWAY OF INSUBSTANTIAL 16 BRIDGE LOL 日本語SUPERMIX '11.ogg" (0:54)

    //:wittystatement.exe

    >>"LAWL U GET WIMENZ"

    //:STARTUP...

    <POSTING>

    <POSTING>

    <POSTING>

    [sexypost]Mm? You said my name?[/sexypost]

    C:\\ |

    EDIT-

    Cool song BTW. ;D

  3. TDon't use an EQ on the songs.

    The artist mixed and produced something a certain way, and you should try to listen to it how they made it rather than altering it.

    Only EQ to compensate for bad frequency response on a system. (really bad bass response on speakers = you enhance the bass)

    Perhaps in a perfect world. That's just such a dogmatic response. Firstly everyone's listening systems are different and anyone who owns more than one pair of headphones will have the "wow, this song sucks on this pair" effect.

    Secondly, whilst trying to keep the EQ all perfect is preferable whilst mixing, the listener has the joys of being able to do what the hell they like. If you want more bass, turn your subwoofer way up. Grating high frequencies? Trim the high EQ. Heck, even the WOW setting on some media players and headphones - go for it if YOU like it.

    I dunno, songs are to be enjoyed, not necessarily clinically analysed.

  4. Muddy songs tend to have instruments that aren't clearly defined or perhaps masked by other instruments. Lack of high frequencies or too much reverb helps to 'clog up' the soundscape too. Hopefully someone else'll come in and go into more detail.

    Do you have any of your stuff that you could post in this thread perhaps?

  5. You know, I used to think that, too, until you posted this.

    What's, with, the overuse, of, commas, wat, learn to, punctuation.

    Also, Neblix, wat? If you're using a limiter on the master you're using a compressor on the master, albeit a specific type of compressor. If you're not using the limiter to limit then you don't need to use one; the dB meters are kinda meant to show levels, and they are EVERYWHERE. Also, loudness wars aside, your track should be at least hitting zero, no questions asked.

  6. I don't want to offend anyone, ...all the way to... A high quality work that is easy on the ears because its been finely polished.

    Life isn't fair, but honestly, this is true. People just stop hitting up the WIPs with predictable sources. You may have the best damn Ice Cap remix ever but it'll just get ignored on the WIP forums for being "another Ice Cap remix". You can argue the hell out of this all you want, it's just what happens.

×
×
  • Create New...