Another example. Windchimes. Those have no human involvement at all, so according to what I've been hearing on this thread, it'll be frowned upon to simply record windchimes and release it as some kind of new age album, simply because you merely recorded them? Same thing here, if a bit different example. I know that this example doesn't deal with human recorded works, but one could argue that if a passage in that album SOUNDS LIKE another person's work, your CD/album could get shot down. "'Chimes of Destiny' sounds like 'a certain song'. I'm suing you." I think this legal challenge has no merit, on the basis of fair use. They train on it sure, but they don't KEEP the source training.
Edit: Another thing I forgot about. This song I've attached was just made by Udio. BUT NOT BY ITSELF. I had to listen to 32 second chunks and actually CHOOSE which I wanted to include with the song. The lyrics were generated by Claude, and even then I had to copy it, and paste the lyrics into the interface. It took like an hour, so there is still very much the human element involved. I'm sorry if anyone here hates country music....hehe