Majin GeoDooD Posted January 11, 2009 Posted January 11, 2009 If you are looking to mount, try DAEMON Tools. I think they are saying that Daemon Tools isn't working properly on 7. I'll reiterate one of my posts earlier.. has anyone tried setting up IIS yet? *edit* Nevermind.. my dumb ass forgot about the Windows Firewall being on by default >.> Quote
phill Posted January 11, 2009 Posted January 11, 2009 I think they are saying that Daemon Tools isn't working properly on 7. OOOH, I see, I was thinking someone was trying to mount the win7 iso. Well, in that case there is also Clone Drive which is suppose to work on 32 and 64 bit versions of Win7 http://www.slysoft.com/en/virtual-clonedrive.html Quote
EdgeCrusher Posted January 11, 2009 Posted January 11, 2009 Hell, post your system rating cpu - 7.1 memory - 5.9 graphics - 7.9 gaming graphics - 5.9 HD - 2.9 Nice little touch adding that MS. Quote
prophetik music Posted January 11, 2009 Posted January 11, 2009 yeah, IN w7, not to install it. virtual clone drive doesnt work, daemon's various versions don't work, alcohol doesn't work, poweriso costs money... nothing's really available right now. Quote
EdgeCrusher Posted January 11, 2009 Posted January 11, 2009 The new windows update is kickyfast as well, and updated all my shit, even new geforce pre release drivers. Hell yeah. Quote
Bleck Posted January 11, 2009 Posted January 11, 2009 nothing's really available right now. poweriso is available for free, if you know what I mean Quote
Majin GeoDooD Posted January 11, 2009 Posted January 11, 2009 Hell, post your system rating cpu - 7.1 memory - 5.9 graphics - 7.9 gaming graphics - 5.9 HD - 2.9 Nice little touch adding that MS. My desktop gets: cpu - 6.4 (C2D E8400) memory - 6.6 (4gb ddr2 800) graphics - 7.9 (geforce 8800gt) gaming graphics 5.9 hd - 3.0 (using an old 80gb drive) Laptop stats: cpu - 4.3 (p4 prescott 3.4ghz) memory - 5.1 (2gb ddr400) graphics - 3.9 (integrated radeon x600) gaming graphics - 3.7 hd - 2.0 (old 5400rpm drive :/) Quote
Bahamut Posted January 11, 2009 Posted January 11, 2009 I get a: Processor: 6.5 (3.0 Ghz E8400 Core 2 Duo) Memory: 6.8 (8 GB of RAM) Graphics: 7.9 (GeForce 8800GT) Gaming Graphics: 5.9 Primary hard disk: 5.9 (500 GB primary hd) Quote
prophetik music Posted January 11, 2009 Posted January 11, 2009 6.5, 7.0, 7.9, 6.9, 5.9. my primary hard drive is partitioned into three drives, and this version of windows is on the second logical partition of a 160g samsung from five years ago. can't wait to test this on a screamer system! this is why i love building computers. Quote
EdgeCrusher Posted January 11, 2009 Posted January 11, 2009 Only reason i got 2.9 on my HD was cause I got it on that 15 gig partition Which is weird. I installed, and it said I had 800 megs free. Booted it today and it said i had 5 gigs free. Quote
prophetik music Posted January 11, 2009 Posted January 11, 2009 temp files, man. that's what happens when you install an os, there's a buttload of temp files left over usually that don't get cleared off until you reboot. Quote
Random Hajile Posted January 12, 2009 Posted January 12, 2009 Processor - 4.9 Ram - 4.9 Graphics - 4.9 Gaming Graphics - 4.8 Primary Hard Disc - 5.3 Not bad for a lappie Quote
Bleck Posted January 12, 2009 Posted January 12, 2009 Processor: 7.1 Memory: 7.1 Graphics: 5.4 Gaming Graphics: 5.0 Primary hard disk: 5.8 Quote
prophetik music Posted January 12, 2009 Posted January 12, 2009 just curious, bleck, what processor do you have? and what speed memory? i'm trying to figure out a quantitive definition for some of these numbers. edit: with my processor at a 4.2ghz overclock (i have a 3ghz dual-core, e8400), i get a 7.9 processor. too bad it's not stable at ALL. Quote
Kaden Posted January 12, 2009 Posted January 12, 2009 hey prophet, try out MagicISO. when i started up my copy on VMWare, it detected it, so, try that maybe. Quote
Majin GeoDooD Posted January 13, 2009 Posted January 13, 2009 http://i.gizmodo.com/5129919/our-first-windows-7-bsod Gasp, BSOD! Quote
EdgeCrusher Posted January 13, 2009 Posted January 13, 2009 I like how all they have to post about it is that they think MS should change the BSOD. Is that really necessary to even make a post about? Quote
Nekofrog Posted January 13, 2009 Posted January 13, 2009 To be completely honest, I've not had a BSOD with XP or Vista that wasn't hardware related -- ie something crucial to operating being unplugged while the computer was on. Ever. Quote
EdgeCrusher Posted January 13, 2009 Posted January 13, 2009 I've had vista now for 6 monthes or so, and have yet to have a BSOD. And of course win7 either in the little bit I've had it. But of course, sounds like they are just being douches about it on gizmodo and trying to find something to fuck up just to wave it around. Quote
Bleck Posted January 13, 2009 Posted January 13, 2009 To be completely honest, I've not had a BSOD with XP or Vista that wasn't hardware related -- ie something crucial to operating being unplugged while the computer was on.Ever. seriously I'm beginning to think the only reason for all the Vista hate in the first place is just a lot of people who fuckin suck at computers it's always ran fantastic for me Quote
Majin GeoDooD Posted January 13, 2009 Posted January 13, 2009 seriously I'm beginning to think the only reason for all the Vista hate in the first place is just a lot of people who fuckin suck at computersit's always ran fantastic for me Haha yea. I mean, I have a pretty solid computer, but I've never had any issues running Vista at all. Windows 7 is running all the better.. I love it. Quote
EdgeCrusher Posted January 13, 2009 Posted January 13, 2009 It's cool to hate windows. Worst thing MS ever did to me was WinME. And that was years ago. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.