djpretzel Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 What did you think? Post your opinion of this ReMix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eino Keskitalo Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 (edited) What did I think? I thought wow. Genre-defying stuff, very fragmented, constantly shifting.. combination of sounds is quite unusual, many points of comparison come to mind (American minimalism for one*).. reminds me also of some classic Shnabubula tracks, which can never be a bad thing. I do think the mixing seemed pretty bright/loud, I had to turn the volume down while listening to the album in sequence for this track. I can live with that, this was a surprising and exciting track, I'm looking forward to listening to this again and again. edit: * lavosslayer thought in the album review thread that Inner Universe by Origa came to mind and I have to agree! --Eino Edited July 2, 2013 by evktalo add point of comparison Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melbu Frahma Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 What did I think? I thought wow. Genre-defying stuff, very fragmented, constantly shifting.. combination of sounds is quite unusual, many points of comparison come to mind (American minimalism for one).. reminds me also of some classic Shnabubula tracks, which can never be a bad thing. I do think the mixing seemed pretty bright/loud, I had to turn the volume down while listening to the album in sequence for this track. I can live with that, this was a surprising and exciting track, I'm looking forward to listening to this again and again.--Eino All this and more. I was definitely getting just a touch of a Yoko Kanno vibe from this, as well, which is never a bad thing at all. My one real complaint was that I was left wishing it was so, so much longer, which is also almost never a bad thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crono3of3time Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 The synths literally hurt my ears. Had to take my headphones off after 30 seconds. o.o; they need to be toned down or removed to some extent. I'm not being metaphorical to any extent. I got a headache and my ears hurt from the noise. I'm not sure where this was trying to go in the least. The introduction seems... rambly... excessively rambling. 1:30 it's kind of going to the song... then kind of not... making that a very long "intro". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scyllus Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Wonderful! I couldn't help but imagine myself Rachel awakening from her sleep going: LOCKELOCKELOCKELOCKELOCKE LOCKELOCKELOCKELOCKELOCKE LOCKELOCKELOCKELOCKELOCKE A great tribiute to the original song- and wonderful vocal work here! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crulex Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 The glitchy, wonky synths were crazy and I dig the female vocals. Certainly a ReMix that seems to come in clear and then break away into an electronic whirl. A tad loud at some parts, but that's not really a problem if you know how to work the volume on your player. Pretty good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moguta Posted July 15, 2013 Share Posted July 15, 2013 Ambitious. The intro left me with high hopes for this track. However, the instrumentation 0:45 onward is really not my style. The distortions and electronic percussion felt too chaotic for my personal taste. Maybe if it had some bass kick I would've enjoyed it as happy hardcore, but as-is I just don't understand where it's going. Also agree the high frequencies sound excessively gained. However, I am a fan of Laura's vocals. They come shining through everything. So this track is a mixed bag for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirChadlyOC Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 I had to listen to this track quite a few times before I "got" it, mostly because it has so many different things going on. Reading the mix write-up helped me see Jeff's vision of Locke seeing Rachel in a dream. Part of what makes it hard to follow is that Rachel's theme is basically a slower version of Locke's theme, so it's hard to notice when there are callbacks to her "voice" in Locke's dreams. Laura's voice is solid, and she really helps push the piece to a higher level.I enjoyed the background that comes in at 0:44 and goes to 1:56. It kind of reminds me of "Into the Giant" music from FF4. Then it's triumphant Locke chorus all the way! This is one of the more "explorational" and diverse songs on the album, especially compared to other more "straight" or "traditional" mixes on disc one. Once I got over the initial shock of hearing something so different, I was able to appreciate it a lot more. Jeff and Laura have created an interesting piece that allows me to hear Locke's theme in an all-new way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pander18 Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Locke's theme has always been one of my favorite tracks from FFVI. I used to let my SNES just kinda sit during the Locke + Moogles fight just so I could have the song loop over and over. So I really wanted to like this. But it just seems to go so far away from what I liked from the theme. I liked the swelling uptempo grandeur of the original, the snares and horns providing one hell of a heroic atmosphere, which this remix skews from completely. If I had gone in anticipating an experimental Japanese-style synth mix, I'd probably have understood and accepted it differently. But outside of a brief point around 2:00, this was an exercise to stay with that I didn't find enjoyable, no relief in sight from constantly diving strings and voices that cacaphonied unpleasantly, with my mindset the entire time being "how is this Locke's Theme"? You can bring up the Rachel callbacks, and it's neat a song references the connection, but I can't think of a song off this album that's less suited to the frequent mental exercise of "if they remade the game, which remixes should replace the original versions?" than this one. I think that summarizes my issue with the song (and it's probably a problem with me rather than the song). I don't dislike the musicianship or singing, I just dislike how different it is from the original in terms of spirit and theme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alorial Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 This is one of my favorites on the album - beautiful soaring vocals. I really like the strings around 2:00, when the song becomes a little truer to Locke's theme, and wish that section was a little longer. It feels like the song really gets going there, and then it's over 90 seconds later. But it still makes me happy to hear, and that is why it will stay one of my favorites. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.