A) Sure, her argument is complete. A complete fucking mess of assumptions and spun-from-wholecloth causal explanations.
-What really bugs me about this is that-
Even moreso than having no answers, Anita has no questions. She contributes nothing but a borish regurgitation of her Women's Studies syllabus material from her undergrad indoctrination.
-Which leads to-
C) Postcolonialist diatribes told from an contrived, overused and ultimately irrelevant narrative perspective that ignores the intents, themes, historical or artistic context of a work in favor of half-baked social analysis aren't any more appealing or right by virtue of a scholarly veneer.