prophetik music

he's posting because he basically finished the website over the weekend =) so now we're waiting on minor edits to Stevo's track, and an ok from Theophany.

good to know. i'll remove the link to the post and add it individually now.

mice respond to different surfaces differently, not to mention that there are different kinds of optical mice for different surfaces. i used a sheet of resume (thick) paper for a year for one of my mice. it sounds like it's just responding in extremes to movement as opposed to having a natural wiggle. so it's just a matter of finding the right material for your mousepad. does jill have any spare fabric sitting around? if not, you can get cheapo stuff from most craft stores for under a dollar. wrap that around your desk side and tape it down, and that might be all you need. of course, you could just do what i did and pick up a logi MX Revolution for like 15$ at a garage sale. best mouse i've ever used, bar none. edit: after re-reading your post, i'm a little curious. you mentioned that you've had other optical mice before...are you sure you've always had optical mice, and not laser mice? optical is a camera watching where you move, specifically, there's no light involved, and it's ok to look directly into the lens (some laser mice have visible lasers, most do not).

i've found that i have issues on certain tabletops. did you try doing this on, say, a sheet of paper, or a mousepad? also, does it wiggle when it's just sitting there, or does it only wiggle when it's being moved?

alright, i purged the crap out of this thread, and kept the few things that had been added in the last few weeks. i forgot past that, so i deleted a lot of relatively recent things that were added to this. so, start posting what you want! particularly abadoss, since i annihilated like fifty entries on the want list from you.

the 8400GSM is even worse than the standard 8400GS, and that's kind of the bare minimum unless you've got a monster processor and a decent amount of ram...which you likely don't have. buy a computer from me, and then you'll be fine.

w7 64-bit doesn't really need more ram - it recommends those because 64-bit applications are often heavy on RAM usage (since that's the whole point of 64-bit windows). except for the architecture difference, there isn't a lot that's changed.

i've been missing every birthday lately. happy you're-older day!

i can't believe that i forgot completely about my involvement with this project. care to change the first post to my current (and accurate) username?

slightly incorrect. 32-bit operating systems can only utilize 2^32 bytes of ram - in other words, 4gb of ram. your system reserves a small amount for usage below the OS level, leaving you with around 3.8 or 3.9 gigabytes of ram. your video card also eats into that - so, if you've got a card with 512mb of vram, you're looking at 3.4-3.5gb of usable ram on your system. 64-bit can use 2^64 bytes of ram, which is closer to 127.5gb. like, mega-server stuff. also, in 32-bit, no one program can use more than 2gb of ram without using a (software) 3gb switch (which are notoriously glitchy to begin with). 64-bit doesn't have this limitation. you'd think that everyone would just use 64-bit, but there's a lot of software incompatibility, particularly with drivers (the Yugo of the software world) and games. there's also the fact that a few processors (out of hundreds) can't function with x64-based systems. it's rare that you have that issue, though. 64-bit software has come miles in the last year or two, though. just check your most-used programs and make sure that they're compatible with 64-bit windows, or that there's a driver for your hardware. i'd suggest 64-bit if you can - it's going to be better in the long run.

it's really too bad that every one of his soundtracks sounds very similar to everything else he's written.

got .wav files from obtuse and dafydd, and am just waiting on stevo, caleb, and a response from theophany.

at least half of these people don't visit the boards...like, at all, anymore.

i'm not. no worries. i mean, this is the OCAD thread, isn't it? isn't this the point of the thread?

which is the hilarious thing, because it was such a stupid comment. i mean, do you really think someone would paint a nice picture for us by hand and then shit on one big section right in the middle?

hey, why is there an egg at the top of the mountain? that's really weird...(BS's comment on the artwork for the Link's Awakening project) you've gotta think before you type, man

the one i linked you.

we're coming up on two years of service of this thread. there is stuff on here that hasn't been updated in two years. i'll be purging this thread soon - probably next week or the week after. i'll leave up the stuff that's relatively recent (ie, i recognize it), and will be dating all entries from now on. if an entry's up and un-updated for more than about six months, i'll take it off. plan accordingly, please. make sure you're letting me know about stuff you've sold elsewhere.

=) good to hear. so, cool story, guess what was the first thing to pop up when i googled "windows 7 mac freeze"?

it's square, what do you expect? =)

that was from a while back. every year, most of the projects cancel themselves on april first. pretty often, everyone believes them, too.

madness? THIS. IS. OCAD.

you probably should, because our original art team of four people dropped to one after three of them bummed out within about a week or so. caleb works a zillion hours a week, he can't cover that. he's got some stuff, and that's all. but it's all hand-painted, none of that electronic crap.