Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  The Coop said:
What do you mean "maybe someday"? The guy's buried six feet down. Is someone planning to dig him up at a later date so they can touch him? Is there a plot you're not filling us in on?

this thread has taken a turn for the worst

or, for the Off-topic

Posted
  Deep Thought said:
Bob Dylan. He was a natural at composing popular music. Granted he's not the greatest singer in the world, and even he's had his controversies, but he still counters the fact that (dare I say it) Michael Jackson's not... that... great.

Maybe, I'll check him out.

  LuketheXjesse said:
2zoj237.jpg

mj.jpg

Posted
  The Author said:
And when it comes to comparing, you can compare anything to anything else.

Like apples and MJ. The comparison will be obvious...

No, I think this is worthy of our time as a form of intellectual exercise.

Posted
  Arcana said:
Why do you WTF and Heads will Roll at the idea of someone like Lady Gaga or Justin Beiber being compared to Michael Jackson?

They are successful musicians who are young and have a lot of skill in singing, dancing, and putting on a show - isn't that a huge start?

In all honesty, Gaga and Bieber have potential, great potential, but it's quite early to say that they are on MJ's level. They'll have a Hell of a lot of hoops to jump through and little boys to share beds with.

Posted

That is without a doubt the worst Ghetto Flame on comparisons I have ever seen.

  Arcana said:
this thread has taken a turn for the worst

I think DarkeSword gave me a reprimand for this exact statement.

Posted
  Salluz said:
little boys

THERE IT IS!

Now the only question remains is why does it matter that people are getting compared? Its all a matter of opinions anyway, so no one is going to be right as it is. Why argue about it on these (generally) civil forums?

Honestly, Jackson was better than most, but that doesn't mean that nobody should aspire for that amount of success.

Posted
  Deep Thought said:
Honestly, Jackson was better than most, but that doesn't mean that nobody should aspire for that amount of success.

True, true. Also, I am open to listen to the songwriters mentioned in this thread.

Posted

I say this with tongue planted firmly in cheek, but I dare anyone not to compare Michael Jackson to the following and view them based on their merits alone AND not thinking of MJ.

this:

or this:

or this:

and I won't even post the Michael Jackson/Sonic 3 comparison videos that are everywhere.

@ Salluz, I think I know what you're saying, and in a sense I guess I agree with you, but anything good that shakes the foundation of something (like MJ did to pop and mainstream entertaining) is going to get compared to things. In my opinion, when people seek to compare against someone else consistently, it only underscores their impact, and honestly, the ripples in the water from Michael Jackson's influence are still seen today. Just the way Elvis, Mozart, James Brown, Queen, Michael Jackson, or any other popular figures in music history (both modern and classical ) left ripples from their influence in the music world. They became a standard for subsets of musicians, whether you agree or not, you know?

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...