k u n g f u c h i c k e n Posted October 23, 2005 Author Posted October 23, 2005 foxhound was just bothered cause I asked him if he'd be able to meet the deadline, and he got kinda upset cause he though I was pressuring him. And he never wanted to show me work at all almost (perfectionist). So I let him go cause I know he is busy.
Hadyn Posted October 23, 2005 Posted October 23, 2005 It's a shame he felt that way, his mix was sounding great.
Hetcenus Posted October 23, 2005 Posted October 23, 2005 I hope he still finishes it when he has time.
Rexy Posted October 23, 2005 Posted October 23, 2005 Speaking of which, now that I've heard that KFC and Snapple aren't on speaking terms anymore (as heard on KFC's VGF call last night), how are we going to think this will fully come together? I don't want to see this go down the drain after months of hard work
Hadyn Posted October 23, 2005 Posted October 23, 2005 Don't worry - even if they quit, a new leader will appear and everything will be fine. The mixing's almost complete, and that's the hardest stage. I'm going *reasonably* well with the website, and the only other real concern is hosting, which we can worry about later. Besides, I doubt either will quit anyway. Hell, they're probably over it already. It's all good... Right people? ~Hadyn
Hetcenus Posted October 23, 2005 Posted October 23, 2005 Right. I believe the project is bigger than anyone involved with it individually, actually it is the same size of we all together. So it simply WON'T get flushed.
k u n g f u c h i c k e n Posted October 23, 2005 Author Posted October 23, 2005 the project wont die, and i don't think me or snapple is going to quit, and who knows, we might get past this. it will just be a little harder is all.
SnappleMan Posted October 23, 2005 Posted October 23, 2005 My personal relationship with KFC in no way affects my dedication to this project. Music has been, and will be first and foremost (in this project and in the entire scene). Don't use this as an excuse to slack off This project is nearing completion and we need everyone to be on the same level in terms of the development process.
KingTiger Posted October 23, 2005 Posted October 23, 2005 So how does one apply to be the remixer of Boss 2? Cus I'm definitely interested.
Xenon Odyssey Posted October 23, 2005 Posted October 23, 2005 So how does one apply to be the remixer of Boss 2? Cus I'm definitely interested. Huh, be like, really really good. And hope they accept you.
KingTiger Posted October 23, 2005 Posted October 23, 2005 So how does one apply to be the remixer of Boss 2? Cus I'm definitely interested. Huh, be like, really really good. And hope they accept you. Ok, so I guess I'll just get started on it then. I thought I had to wait for Snapple or KFC to give me the go-ahead. Thanks! (So do I just submit a WIP to one of them?)
KyleJCrb Posted October 23, 2005 Posted October 23, 2005 So how does one apply to be the remixer of Boss 2? Cus I'm definitely interested. Huh, be like, really really good. And hope they accept you. Ok, so I guess I'll just get started on it then. I thought I had to wait for Snapple or KFC to give me the go-ahead. Thanks! (So do I just submit a WIP to one of them?) Yeah, that should work, I think.
Yellow 13 Posted October 24, 2005 Posted October 24, 2005 This looks like a pretty cool project, can't wait to hear the end result... even if it does take a while (But waiting is half the fun anyway) .
Nicole Adams Posted October 24, 2005 Posted October 24, 2005 Yoshi84 was featured on Boss 2 last time I checked. Yeah, that didn't work out. I was planning on giving NutS some vocals for his Boss 2 remix, but all I had available to use was a craptastic headset mic. I had the opportunity to borrow a great condenser mic, but waited too long.
k u n g f u c h i c k e n Posted October 24, 2005 Author Posted October 24, 2005 My personal relationship with KFC in no way affects my dedication to this project. Don't use this as an excuse to slack off seconded and thirded people. i have been questioned about the possible patching up of me and snapple friend wise, and it will take a process i'll say that much, so don't worry. (also snapple, thanks for being so prompt with the project updates)
SnappleMan Posted October 24, 2005 Posted October 24, 2005 Yeah, just PM me whenever you need something done and I'll take care of it. Also, have you heard from Sixto? He should be done by now.
k u n g f u c h i c k e n Posted October 24, 2005 Author Posted October 24, 2005 I don't recall seeing him online in awhile, but he did mention on the forums about going on vacation. I have yet to recieve the file for the song either
Holy Warrior Azar Posted October 27, 2005 Posted October 27, 2005 Why has Snappleman suddenly become "UnderCoat". What is an UnderCoat anyway?
k u n g f u c h i c k e n Posted October 27, 2005 Author Posted October 27, 2005 Undercoat? Hehe, loser.
-RK- Posted October 27, 2005 Posted October 27, 2005 Why has Snappleman suddenly become "UnderCoat". What is an UnderCoat anyway? Well, it could be many different things. If I'm not mistaken, it's a coat. And, not only is it a coat, it's a coat that goes UNDER another coat. What's more, it would probably be thinner than the coat it is under... but then what do I know?
SnappleMan Posted October 27, 2005 Posted October 27, 2005 Well, we have an OverCoat, why not an UnderCoat?
Liontamer Posted October 27, 2005 Posted October 27, 2005 Well, we have an OverCoat, why not an UnderCoat? You're Seattle UnderCoat.
Xenon Odyssey Posted October 28, 2005 Posted October 28, 2005 Well, we have an OverCoat, why not an UnderCoat? You're Seattle UnderCoat. soc vs. suc? k.
Holy Warrior Azar Posted October 28, 2005 Posted October 28, 2005 Why has Snappleman suddenly become "UnderCoat". What is an UnderCoat anyway? Well, it could be many different things. If I'm not mistaken, it's a coat. And, not only is it a coat, it's a coat that goes UNDER another coat. What's more, it would probably be thinner than the coat it is under... but then what do I know? I thought it might of been in reference to theft by sticking things under your coat, hence the code name undercoat. but I think I like your description better. Well, we have an OverCoat, why not an UnderCoat? That makes sense to me. I guess...
Recommended Posts