HideousBeing Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 I've been wondering, what does it take for a game to be rated Adults Only? In the violence field, ESRB says "extreme graphic violence" or something like that. How could it be any worse than in any normal game rated M for violence? I assume it must be the suggestive themes? (i.e. men graphically killing babies with chainsaws or something) And what about the nudity part? Will a woman, completely naked, exposing total front and backside nudity require a game to be rated AO? Or can Mature handle that? Maybe there must be actual graphic sexual activity? Help me out here, and please use examples. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalzon Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 Things like explicit sex and extreme torture. San Andreas got an AO rating because of the Hot Coffee mod, recall? I imagine the violence has to be a little more graphic than a simple decapitation or amputation. It needs to look more "real". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beatdown Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 In a word, porn. I've played games with enough gore and foul language to make a soccer mom turn green, but the moment a set of tig ol bitties pops up on the screen I guarantee you it will be AO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Coop Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 In a word, porn. I've played games with enough gore and foul language to make a soccer mom turn green, but the moment a set of tig ol bitties pops up on the screen I guarantee you it will be AO. There have been a number of games over the years that have had bare breasts. I think it has to do with what happens with the nudity (i.e. fucking), rather than just nudity itself. Besides... isn't God of War supposed to have bare breasted women? I know in Painkiller, there's a nip slip or two with Eve in the cinemas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILLiterate Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 Take it like the MPAA, it says violence, but the violence isn't the biggest part. It's mostly about nudity and sex in a position other than missionary or girl on top, then people start freaking out for no apparent reason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beatdown Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 There have been a number of games over the years that have had bare breasts. I think it has to do with what happens with the nudity (i.e. fucking), rather than just nudity itself.Besides... isn't God of War supposed to have bare breasted women? I know in Painkiller, there's a nip slip or two with Eve in the cinemas. That's true. God of War not only had boobies, but in the very beginning of the second stage in the original you could hop back in bed with both topless ladies and play a minigame that had you beating it up offscreen while watching a table thump increasingly harder. Not only that, but the chick who told you where to go had a veil that may as well have been transparant on her body, and the gorgons you fought were topless (does not count, worst boobies ever). I'm guessing a lot of that was leaning more towards the fact that historically they just didn't wear that much in those days anyway. However unlike the Hot Coffee nonsense in GTA, the sweater puppies themselves weren't the main focus when they were on screen. They were kinda just there. That and Kratos exudes an aura of such strong awesomeness that I don't think anyone really cared that much about it. I still stand by the porn statement though. There's a fine line between brief nudity (PG-13/R) and blatant sex (AO/XXX/Internet). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PassivePretentiousness Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 http://www.esrb.org/ratings/search.jsp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beatdown Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 http://www.esrb.org/ratings/search.jsp I forgot about Thrill Kill. I loved that game so much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antacid03 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Here's my rant about the subject. Stupid ESRB... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maco70 Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 http://www.esrb.org/ratings/search.jsp Damn, you beat me to it. ><;; I did a project on ESRB, and I thought the number of AO rated games was intersting. And to whoever played Thrill Kill: Discuss Please, I am insanely curious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avatar of Justice Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 Here's my rant about the subject.Stupid ESRB... In your rant when you said "American taxes at heard at work" where you making the assumption the ESRB is a government sponsored agency? It isn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devyn Posted April 11, 2007 Share Posted April 11, 2007 In a word, porn. I've played games with enough gore and foul language to make a soccer mom turn green, but the moment a set of tig ol bitties pops up on the screen I guarantee you it will be AO. I hate to there, but I have to say it: It's ridiculous how people drool over violence, but have a heart attack when they see some titties. Violence = bad (entertaining of course, but still bad) Nude attractive women = good (and still very entertaining) I think a lot of people have their priorities confused Now, if you'll excuse me, let's get back to the topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WesPip Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 and the gorgons you fought were topless (does not count, worst boobies ever You clearly have not played GoW2 yet. If you have, certainly not to Euryale, and DEFINITELY not to Clotho [that is, the third Sister of Fate]. CLEARLY. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antacid03 Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 In your rant when you said "American taxes at heard at work" where you making the assumption the ESRB is a government sponsored agency? It isn't. How do you suppose they get paid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Author Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 How do you suppose they get paid? By getting videogame companies to pay for the ratings. It's the same thing as the ISO9000 scam. A bunch of people invent a standard, they make it seem like it is a good thing to have. And then they impose it on companies, who willingly pay to receive an arbitrary classification. As soon as the standard becomes popular, they set it up better and then companies, who fail to see how the ISO standard was establish, start paying like gullible fools. And us, the consumers, are not in anyway better. We see ISO9000 certification and we assume that it actually means something important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.