Jump to content

Gario

Judges
  • Posts

    7,570
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    81

Everything posted by Gario

  1. Oh my God, this is fucking awesome. You got some kickass chiptune skillz, man - I envy you. I want all your NSF files... nao. EDIT: I dl'd your stuff, btw. It's all pretty damn solid chiptune glory, here. Up there with RushJet, at least.
  2. Woa, woa, woa... Time out. The only response I've gotten for my track up 'til now is that the bass is too soft. Please go into my WIP thread that I have up on it and give me some more feedback on it, there, 'cause I'm working on getting this track as pretty as I can. Thanks for the feedback, btw.
  3. I think the thread calmed down a while ago, Ben & Neblix. There's no need for the call to calm down, in this case; someone asked about voting politics, a few people came in with what they thought and everyone's moved on from it. There was a minor issue on it and it's been resolved, so there's no need to call everyone out on it like this. On another note, personally I rather enjoy reviews of my tracks - good or bad, it's always fun reading what people think of my tracks. It's personally my favorite part of the compo (though I sadly haven't been as active in that department - sorry guys!). Just sayin', is all, so I can back PH up on that point.
  4. Yeah, don't be discouraged by it - OCR is just one place with a pretty specific requirement. You have the chops to make awesome stuff; right now it's just a matter of getting it in a specific format that OCR is looking for, if you're shooting to be an OCRemixer. Good luck with future WIPs, man. EDIT: Hey, don't change the title because you're not working on it - other people should be allowed to enjoy the work you already put in!
  5. Eh... you'd have a hard time passing this one through the panel. The sound quality is pretty good, and the source is all there, but OCR isn't the sort of place for a song that sounds like three songs, as stated here... I think you can still make this work, but it's going to take a bit of rearranging, altogether. That electro section just can't be in this song - it simply doesn't work for the sake of cohesiveness. The last section could be build into the song, I suspect, but you'd need to return to it's deeper roots. Or you can base the song off another section of the track - they all would work pretty well on their own, just not together like this. If you want to submit to OCR you need a more cohesive track. That's not to say this isn't good, because it is; it's just not what OCR is looking for, as it stands.
  6. I seriously doubt Darke would have the secret Round 10 mixes happen any time before Jan. 10th - MAGfest is going to consume many people's lives between next week and the week after. Don't fret too much on it.
  7. To be honest, the reason you're doing as 'poorly' as you are now is simply because you're doing more the Castle-style gauntlet rather than the heads-up style of the more regular Maverick/RM battles. It's one thing to make a mix and compare it to a single other mix. It's a whole different ballgame when everyone's mixes are compared against everyone else's mix. You'd be surprised - your mixing style would have a very good chance to win out over other mixes that are currently winning in this round if it were done in a heads-up fashion. I seriously doubt there's a popularity contest going on in here, not by the way everyone's been voting every round. There are just that many great tracks to vote against. Especially this round - there wasn't a single 'poor' remix on the bill, this time. The competition is amazingly tough, even from the people that are unknowns. Besides, if it WERE a popularity contest you'd be getting way more votes, 'cause we all love you for the sigs.
  8. For once I'm not competing with you personally so I'm looking forward to it
  9. There's a lot of heat on your squares and they pierce too much, causing pain to your listeners. Round the sound of your square waves by lowering the EQ in the upper mids to highs. The beginning is pretty neat, with the drums + melody (though it should introduce a bassline somewhere in there - it's too hollow for too long). There's a lot of wasted potential in there, though, since you do not return to any of the ideas presented in that section. Ultimately, it's cool, but unfortunately disconnected to the rest of the song. If you reintroduced some of it later into the song it would be incredibly effective. The arrangement is pretty repetitive. I hear the effects that break it up, and all, but overall it's just the same section of the source repeating over and over. And over. I think you could get away with it, but I really recommend exploring some more of the source to break the monotony of the track. I like the dirty effects, and the production is pretty good. This track isn't bad, really, but I suspect it would get a 'RESUB' from the panel, if you were to submit it as is. It just seems too monotonous to keep people's attention past the first minute or two. Make the arrangement more varied and make the square wave less painful to listen to and you'll probably be in good shape for submission.
  10. Even if you agree with Jack's message, this is still not the right place to post it. His subject matter is not about SOPA but about copyright itself. People are not here to talk about copyright again, but to discuss this current law that may or may not come into effect. Quite honestly I might like to discuss what Jack has to offer, but this is not the right place to do so, and thus I've avoided pushing the topic further. If anyone wants to have an intelligent discussion on it, make a new PPR thread about it - that forums been dead for a while anyway, may as well bring something up that'll spark it back to life again. I'm not disregarding his message for the sake of it - I'm disregarding it because I would like this thread to continue on it's intended trajectory. Please, if anyone wants to continue their Jack-off-topic discourse make a new thread about it in PPR. This isn't PPR, so I'm not going to have a PPR discussion about it here, and we shouldn't be expected to, either.
  11. The bass is as loud as it can physically go, now; any louder and the bass clips in an incredibly abrasive manner. There's some minor sidechaining against the drums which kills some of the volume, but as far as what the bass is it's physically as loud as most others on OCR. It's not an acoustically complex bass, so it doesn't have as much presence as other songs might, but stylistically that's not what this song calls for, either. Hopefully it's enough. I further adjusted the highs on the track (there was a master that was artificially raising them, funny I didn't think to turn it off earlier), and I've tinkered more with the main lead's envelopes that were causing a lot of sonic grief. I touched on some of the panning, though not too much. It's the only way I could fit as much stiff in here as I have while keeping most of the parts pretty clear. I hope it's enough toning down, here. Alright, I think it's had enough tune up - I'll submit tomorrow, barring nothing else is really wrong with it. Thanks for the help, guys.
  12. The Damned's post pretty much makes Jack's return worthwhile. Alright, back on topic: has anyone seen SOPA/PIPA's reasoning behind removing due process from copyright enforcement? I heard about the whole bypass of due process everywhere, read the bill and found it to be true. I really, really want to know what pro-SOPA/PIPA people would have to say about the blatant breach of the 5th amendment.
  13. We still don't agree with your positions on copyright, Jack, and no, people don't think that this was an 'inevitable outcome' of copyrights, but rather a power struggle with the middle man. Despite what you believe, people saw this one coming from miles away. The only surprise that came to any of us was that it's gotten as far into congress as it has. Correlation does not equal causation, so no, this event does not validate your position (or Lawrence's position, for that matter) like you'd want to believe. Maybe you should learn a little bit about basic logic before posting something like this. By the way, waltzing into a thread and calling everybody on the site a moron, or wait, as you put it... ... alright, yeah, everyone, isn't the best way to push any position, even if it were correct. It just makes you look like an immature twelve year old who just learned how to use online forums for the first time, and everyone else will treat you as such. If you want any intelligent discourse on it, respond in a manner that doesn't denigrate other members on the site. You get brownie points if you actually make your responses in the appropriate threads (or even make a new one to fit your ranting) rather than derail the current one with your thoughts. Or not. Fuckall if anyone cares about you past the point that you're trolling and breaking the thread (making fun of other members to get a response is a form of 'trolling').
  14. Really getting into the spirit of the competition, eh?
  15. No, it's not tolerated. This isn't "America", it's a website. The site has a right to restrict speech for the sake of peace. EDIT: That's a helluva ninja, man.
  16. The keyboard setup is balls, I admit, but once you get around that it's pretty damn good. Worth it to get used to the abysmal controls, imo, or map it to a joypad.
  17. Great piano work, guys - it has all of the right embellishments, great overall tone and some very nice integration of the themes. Knowing that Evory is a competent pianist himself, it's interesting to see him simply score a piece for Doc Nano to perform. Very well done, you two. I hope to hear more from you guys.
  18. Huh, I was just thinking a few days ago 'Wonder where Jabond23's been off to, lately?'. Interesting coincidence, I've got to say. Going to say this right off the bat, the synths and guitar don't match up, harmonically. If you move all of the synths up a whole step (or two half steps) it should work out much better for you. Try that out and listen to the result - it should sound significantly better. It's hard to judge the quality of the track right now, because the off kilter nature of the harmony is very distracting. I'll come back and see if I can help you more when that's lined up properly.
  19. Ouch, I was trying to check it out, and the link doesn't work for me.
  20. Rokko Chan KyleJcrb posted this little gem on Facebook, and I've got to say it's pretty sweet. If you're used to Mega Man (and I know you all are) the jumping physics can take some getting used to, but otherwise it's a pretty wonderful (and unofficial) free Mega Man game. Go check it out.
  21. The OCR Facebook page updates it's users whenever there's a new track. If you 'like' that page you'll get pretty regular updates on the site.
  22. Alright, I fixed the thingies you told me about, and it sounds even better. If anyone else has commentary, just let me know The old link has been updated with the new shiznat.
  23. Woa shit, dude, I thought you were younger than me, for some reason. Nope, you're truly an old fogey, especially today.

    Happy birthday, Jewbie!

  24. I'm thinking of subbing this one, since I haven't subbed anything to OCR since March, and I'd like to start getting more awesome musics onto the site again Any suggestions on this one? Drag Me Up (to Heaven) It's adjusted a bit from the one on the WCRG compo, btw, so download it fresh here. I felt like I ran out of time on the compo version, so this one has a couple of neat tweaks that I originally intended to make it more interesting. Enjoy, and let me know what should be fixed in it
×
×
  • Create New...