Jump to content

Mega Man: The Wily Castle Remix Gauntlet 2013

DarkeSword

By DarkeSword,
in Competitions

 Share

Recommended Posts

timaeus222 Enthusiast

timaeus222

Posted
Posted (edited)
  Brandon Strader said:
If it sounds like a duck, and looks like a duck, it can't possibly be a duck because he put a limiter on it that specifically protects against ducks

Fun fact: on my Round 2 entry, I drew from my own soundbank of duck-like synth leads (that I didn't even make for that specific remix)---80's acid house bass (as a lead), modified moog, and something I made myself that I can't really describe by name. ;)

Edited by timaeus222
Magnetic Ether Newbie

Magnetic Ether

Posted
Posted

Just a note for all the mastering newbies, it is possible to have clipping in your track even if you put a limiter on the master. No, the sound level will never go above whatever you set the ceiling to, however it's still possible to clip a signal before it gets to the master track, in which case you will still be able to hear clipping. Really you need to make sure that none of the individual tracks are clipping before they get to the master, as well as any incoming signal if you are recording live instruments.

Shadix Newbie

Shadix

Posted
Posted
  timaeus222 said:

There is no Gravity on Mercury

Jameson Sutton: Action feel is nice. The bass sounds like the one from the Oldskool Demon OC ReMix. :P Production is OK, but the balance is off overall. Note rhythms seem to be keyboarded in. Nice modulations here and there.

Its a machine swing duder. I plop note for note. I'm all-clicktual.

Track was rough because I work 12 hour shifts every day :(. Wanted to do another pass. Didn't have time because I had to go back to work.

timaeus222 Enthusiast

timaeus222

Posted
Posted
  Shadix said:
Its a machine swing duder. I plop note for note. I'm all-clicktual.

Track was rough because I work 12 hour shifts every day :(. Wanted to do another pass. Didn't have time because I had to go back to work.

It's okay man. You did what you had time to do. Besides, the comment about the bass being like the one from 'Oldskool Demon' was a compliment. ;)

Jivemaster Newbie

Jivemaster

Posted
Posted (edited)

Lol I love how everyone is corrrecting Timaeus' reviews. I would like to say we all appreciate said feedback, regardless if it's "right" or "wrong". It's good to hear what someone thinks from their perspective. It's not like anyone career stopping is reading this thread XD

Edited by Jivemaster
Jason Covenant Newbie

Jason Covenant

Posted
Posted
  timaeus222 said:
Yeah, I guess that's what I heard. It may just have sounded like it was clipping because the sample rate reduction was a bit too intense. Besides, it's not that big a deal that I was wrong. So what?

So, nothing. I don't think anyone thought it was a big deal. Darke's purposes may differ, but I see these compos as an opportunity for education and experimentation above all else.

  Jivemaster said:
Lol I love how everyone is corrrecting Timaeus' reviews. I would like to say we all appreciate said feedback, regardless if it's "right" or "wrong".

I don't think anyone is saying that they don't appreciate feedback. The scare quotes are unnecessary too, since both instances were objective matters, not subjective.

Objectively wrong feedback is often just as useful. For example, in round 1, some people commented on the guitars in my mix. There were no guitars in my mix, but I learned that a certain synth sounded an awful lot like a guitar. It was a coincidence, but it made me think about the saturation/distortion methods I used on it and worked backwards. By the time I was working on my next mix, I had a functional pseudo guitar amp that I tested on WillRock's dry signal. I was actually able to replicate a simplification of the tone he used on the amped signal. I would've never thought to try this at all, had someone not called that synth a guitar. I doubt I'll ever use this to create a sim guitar (the real thing will always be better), but at the very least, it'll inform my methods when using guitars in the future.

In Ben's case, he now knows that certain types of bitcrushing can be mistaken for clipping. He'll probably be careful about that from now on.

Gario Collaborator

Gario

Posted
Posted

Yeah, gonna ride on Prophecy's line of thinking and add that if the audience hears something as an issue one should pay attention to what they're saying - even if what they said is technically incorrect, the fact that they heard it in that light means that there is something in your track that sounds like the issue that they're hearing. Whether or not it needs to be addressed is always up to the author, of course, but it should be noted that the audience may not be hearing it the way that you do.

KingTiger Newbie

KingTiger

Posted
Posted
  Gario said:
Yeah, gonna ride on Prophecy's line of thinking and add that if the audience hears something as an issue one should pay attention to what they're saying - even if what they said is technically incorrect, the fact that they heard it in that light means that there is something in your track that sounds like the issue that they're hearing. Whether or not it needs to be addressed is always up to the author, of course, but it should be noted that the audience may not be hearing it the way that you do.

this.

Really guys, don't overreact to what anyone says, even if that "one" is an expert in production, arrangement, synthesis/sound design, what have you. Whether it's me, timaeus, Ben Briggs, or anyone. Everyone has useful feedback, and everyone has something to learn; it's all about perspective and direction.

Jivemaster Newbie

Jivemaster

Posted
Posted
  Prophecy said:
Objectively wrong feedback is often just as useful. For example, in round 1, some people commented on the guitars in my mix. There were no guitars in my mix, but I learned that a certain synth sounded an awful lot like a guitar. It was a coincidence, but it made me think about the saturation/distortion methods I used on it and worked backwards. By the time I was working on my next mix, I had a functional pseudo guitar amp that I tested on WillRock's dry signal. I was actually able to replicate a simplification of the tone he used on the amped signal. I would've never thought to try this at all, had someone not called that synth a guitar. I doubt I'll ever use this to create a sim guitar (the real thing will always be better), but at the very least, it'll inform my methods when using guitars in the future.

In Ben's case, he now knows that certain types of bitcrushing can be mistaken for clipping. He'll probably be careful about that from now on.

Thanks Jason, this is actually what I was getting at. My words are never chosen well. ;)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...