Pipez Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfa9t-TeeVU Looks more like a Hannah Montana cash-in than an adaptation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 You mean the other Hasbro owned movies weren't cash-ins?Like Transformers? Or Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen? Or GI Joe? Or Transformers: Dark of the Moon? Or Battleship? Or GI Joe 2: Rise of Cobra? Or Transformers: Age of Extinction? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Coop Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 This doesn't look like Jem, it looks more like a bad and generic Hallmark movie of the week. Maybe I'll be proven wrong, but I don't think I will be from what I saw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
His Infinite Machine Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 No. God no. God please no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngelCityOutlaw Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 While Jem was before my time, I did see the odd episode on Teletoon Retro way back when. I must say I was really not expecting a good movie to come out of the source material. I was sure the soundtrack would just be updated to be whatever generic pop the kids are into at the time. I was certain it would be stylistically similar to some lame teen drama. but....but...the trailer has shown me that it will not be so bad after all. It will be much, much worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleck Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 haha wow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollow Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 I am not familiar with the source material at all, but I couldn't even get thru the trailer. My memory is fuzzy but "let's record her singing, put it up on youtube, get millions of hits, now all of a sudden the 'top producer' wants to sign us' " or something like that, all seems very horrible to me. I try to have an open mind when I can, but I already vehemently do not want to see this. Vehemently, I say. Vehemently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orlouge82 Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 Thanks to all of you kids making me feel old by saying that Jem was "before your time." The movie looks nothing like the source material, which is unsurprising, since they left the show's creator completely out of developing it -- much to the chagrin of the original show's fans. Another nostalgia cash-in if I've ever seen one. These types of movies are about where comic book movies were in the 1980s and 1990s (sans Blade): looking to make a quick buck with no reverence for the source material whatsoever. We can only hope that nostalgia cash-ins get to where comic book movies are now (for the most part -- DC still has a LOOOONG way to go). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 I am not familiar with the source material at all, but I couldn't even get thru the trailer. My memory is fuzzy but "let's record her singing, put it up on youtube, get millions of hits, now all of a sudden the 'top producer' wants to sign us' " or something like that, all seems very horrible to me. I try to have an open mind when I can, but I already vehemently do not want to see this. Vehemently, I say. Vehemently. You see in the 80's, Gem was outrageous. Truly, truly, truly outrageous. Her music: contagious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
His Infinite Machine Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 You see in the 80's, Gem was outrageous. Truly, truly, truly outrageous. Her music: contagious. Like the flu. Or in extreme cases, AIDS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 The question begs to be asked: "Can we vaccinate against Jem?" Besides, this movie doesn't even have the Misfits. Their songs were better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devyn Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 (edited) I'm sorry but I can't get behind this one. I remember watching this show with my cousins when I was little and it wasn't one of my favorites, but I remember the antagonists being "The Misfits" (not to be confused with the great horror-punk band The Misfits), and the music being very eighties pop-rock. I think at least they could've stuck truer to the material. I think fans will be disappointed. Sorry for being a hater and judging the book by it's cover, but ewww...sorry. Edited May 21, 2015 by Devyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Coop Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 No need to apologize. Everyone knows that this movie's going to be so far from good, that it'll take the light from "good" a thousand years to reach it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngelCityOutlaw Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Callin' it now. It'll be popular with 12/13 year olds and they'll turn it into a trilogy at minimum. The concern that we'll be bombarded with sequels is real. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rexy Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 I too was too young to get into the Jem cartoons, being a toddler by the time it finished. But just from 15 minutes of reading up the show's premise BEFORE watching that trailer, I have to say it makes Michael Bay's TMNT movie look like the Magna Carta. Seriously, if you're going to translate a beloved cartoon to the big screen, at least keep as many of the core elements as possible. Of all the ways they could have made Jem relevant for the 2010s, changing the original leading-double-life-and-helping-others toon into a into a tween rags-to-riches / personality identity story completely stripped its own persona. Then again, I complain at almost every remake there is, so it may just be the cynical old lady in me talking. But at least I know that I'm still not alone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pipez Posted August 11, 2015 Author Share Posted August 11, 2015 So turns out there actually will be holograms...kinda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoshiBlade Posted August 11, 2015 Share Posted August 11, 2015 (Sigh)......a new nostalgia cash in with Disney's latest corp of scientifically formulated tween stars.....this is just outrageous.....truly, truly, truly outrageous... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceansAndrew Posted August 11, 2015 Share Posted August 11, 2015 Was anyone here really a huge fan of the original show? Like, I thought the original show was pretty bad even when I was a child. I strongly doubt anyone on this site is the target audience for this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Coop Posted August 11, 2015 Share Posted August 11, 2015 One doesn't need to be a fan of the show to see how fubar this rendition of it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkeSword Posted August 11, 2015 Share Posted August 11, 2015 One doesn't need to be a fan of the show yep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meteo Xavier Posted August 11, 2015 Share Posted August 11, 2015 I'm with OA. Every time I see some poster whine about some adaption being marketed to the "tween" generation or "today's kids" or whatever, I have to think the studios would respond with, "Dude, you're a man in your mid-30s complaining about a girls' cartoon from the 80s. Don't you have a physical you need to prep for?" Adults making big deals about children's cartoons fills me with nausea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pipez Posted August 11, 2015 Author Share Posted August 11, 2015 The problem I have is that it really doesn't feel like an adaption, from what I've seen. It's like they started out with an unrelated project and added Jem names to it. It looks like a generic "rags to riches" story. Also, who is this really for? The original fans will probably find it too loose and the tweens probably won't care about the Jem stuff. Heard the comic series is decent at least. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Coop Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 I'm with OA. Every time I see some poster whine about some adaption being marketed to the "tween" generation or "today's kids" or whatever, I have to think the studios would respond with, "Dude, you're a man in your mid-30s complaining about a girls' cartoon from the 80s. Don't you have a physical you need to prep for?" Adults making big deals about children's cartoons fills me with nausea. We're on a website that's dedicated to adults making big deals about video games and video game music from their childhood. It really shouldn't be a shock to you that cartoons would follow suit, especially in light of how many 80s cartoons have been getting the Hollywood treatment (and thoroughly butchered in the process in some cases). And if you're going to puke, do it quietly and in the designated barf bags that can be found at the entrance and exit of each thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rexy Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 I'm with OA. Every time I see some poster whine about some adaption being marketed to the "tween" generation or "today's kids" or whatever, I have to think the studios would respond with, "Dude, you're a man in your mid-30s complaining about a girls' cartoon from the 80s. Don't you have a physical you need to prep for?" I'm sorry Meteo, but there's a fine line between changing something up radically and just catering for the market. As Pipez said, it all comes down to whether the kids would actually catch on to it or not, and if they do, fair play. Nostalgia isn't going to get anywhere, but if it's something the kids had seen too many times before from different characters, it's absolutely not going to work. It's a shipwreck almost waiting to happen. In relation to The Coop's posts about 80s cartoons being given the dreadful movie approach, may I also bring up Alvin and the Chipmunks? Sure, it started in the 60s as a novelty 'band' of sorts, but I grew up with the 80s cartoon and understood it kept its format from another Chipmunks show as done in the 60s, Right now, I am in disbelief as to how they keep making so many films about them, especially since there's not much substance beyond 'singing rodents cause havoc and make a butt monkey out of their manager', and critic scores absolutely show. However, the one redeeming feature for the Chipmunks is that in spite of all the modern music updates, it nails the original premise. Awful films or not, it's the Chipmunks as they should be. Going back to Jem, we all already know at this point that we have a terrible loose adaptation coming that won't fuel nostalgia in any shape or form, and that to me is a new low just to get a quick buck. I don't know if there are any other movie adaptations that had gone as far as changing up the plot of their source material entirely, but unless any examples of these come to the surface, then I feel we 'adults-around-30-preparing-for-a-prep' have a reason have a reason to complain. (Seriously, kids may be easily marketable, but they sure as hell aren't stupid.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pipez Posted August 13, 2015 Author Share Posted August 13, 2015 Rexy, I've heard people compare this to the Josie and the Pussycats movie (though that one at least tried to be a satire on the music industry). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.