Tex Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Once ReMixes are posted in OCR, they cannot be revised/replaced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liontamer Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 If we do this, we'd update torrents and provide a general update, but nothing tied to the ReMix RSS feed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkeSword Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Also any changes would be noted in the Changelog. It's not just for removals, folks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unununium Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Also any changes would be noted in the Changelog. Thanks, found it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audio fidelity Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 you made zeromus happy EDIT:: but he will still destroy you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmr Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 Also any changes would be noted in the Changelog.It's not just for removals, folks! Not all previous changes have been noted, though. I know that OCR01489 was replaced with a new remixed & remastered version several months after it was originally posted, yet there's no mention of it in the changelog. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WillRock Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 I have just found this thread and I approve I have thought that 8 megabytes would be a better alternative for a long time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Strader Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 8 Men in Black? What is this MiB you speak of? The historical binary interpretation of mega is still in wide use by the consumer software industry and use of the mebi prefix is still not common. Sorry, you gave me a bit of a nerd seizure and I couldn't help it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozovian Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 It's just to be specific, I guess. It does give us 192 more KiB to work with (than a strict 8 thousand), and nobody has to fret about being a few blocks over 8000K. 8MiB: 8 388 608 B 8MB: 8 000 000 B I like having almost 400K more to work with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moguta Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 Not all previous changes have been noted, though. I know that OCR01489 was replaced with a new remixed & remastered version several months after it was originally posted, yet there's no mention of it in the changelog. Oooo, thanks. I had no idea about this. Awesome news on the 2MB filesize increase, too. But, DarkeSword... you say that the Changelog is not just for removals, but removals are all that I see there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkeSword Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 Oooo, thanks. I had no idea about this. Awesome news on the 2MB filesize increase, too.But, DarkeSword... you say that the Changelog is not just for removals, but removals are all that I see there? Because nothing else really gets changed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dafydd Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Does this mean the minimum length required for a song to pass (no matter how good it is) has been increased as well? The shortest mix on the site, afaik, is 0:47, and I doubt anything 2:00 would suffice these days. Is there a hard minimum length? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palpable Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Does this mean the minimum length required for a song to pass (no matter how good it is) has been increased as well? The shortest mix on the site, afaik, is 0:47, and I doubt anything 2:00 would suffice these days. Is there a hard minimum length? Nope, still no minimum length. If a song can be sufficiently developed and interpretive under 2 minutes, we'll take it. It would be rare, but possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dafydd Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 I agree on that last part. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampire Hunter Dan Posted November 12, 2009 Share Posted November 12, 2009 haha oh noes Also: hurray. =D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.