Jump to content

Pokémon: The Missingno Tracks - History


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's pretty much whatever you see in Private WIPs and Finalized Remixes. Everything else is free.

I know, I know... "The Dammed, do a new tracklist", "that's your job amongst other things", "stop emailing me pictures of your crotch", "I'm serious, stop it"...

OK, first page updated with a tracklist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a quick look at the website and wanted to mention that I didn't like this post:

i do'nt want to use flac because no one's got the stupid program. one of the keys to soundtrack download is making sure that it's in a file format that is easy to use. even if we link to the flac site, it's still another step that'll turn off people.

just something simple. 160kbps is fine.

I can tell the difference between 160kbps CBR and lossless. After putting so much effort into a track, there's no reason to muffle it; it doesn't do it any justice. So if there's any indecision as to whether or not to include FLAC, there's my two bits.

I can't see how it would turn people off if they had a choice between MP3 and FLAC. It's just a few extra boxes to tick and untick in bittorrent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why 160kbps? Why not 192 or even 224?... Seems redundant to put together such a big project and then offer it in mediocre quality. Sure you don't want to use FLAC, that's understandable, but that doesn't mean you can't make use of MP3's higher quality bitrates.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Why 160kbps? Why not 192 or even 224?... Seems redundant to put together such a big project and then offer it in mediocre quality. Sure you don't want to use FLAC, that's understandable, but that doesn't mean you can't make use of MP3's higher quality bitrates.

Ouch. Don't give any to him.

;P I don't think redundant was the right word.

You guys have been getting a lot of flac for not giving us a release date, so there should be plenty of .FLAC to go around.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ouch. Don't give any to him.

;P I don't think redundant was the right word.

You guys have been getting a lot of flac for not giving us a release date, so there should be plenty of .FLAC to go around.

Radiohead got away with the 160kbps In Rainbows because a physical release was to be expected. :P When you're supplying virtually the only copy, I just think it's a good idea to sacrifice saving a couple dozen megabytes for better quality tracks that will ultimately be more enjoyable

I like the pun :P

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also for those who are concerned about saving space, it would be valuable to learn to convert hi-fi audio to the format of your choice. That way, the musicians can present hi-fi music, audiophiles can get their cleaner tracks, and the casual listeners can have their efficient MP3's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ick. I go away for a few days and stuff happens.

OK, first, a release date. Due to some unfortunate MIAs fro some of the remixing staff, we had to reopen submissions to get a few more people in. They have to do their remixes, as well as the other remixers that have theirs in development. So a release date will be announced when it's ready to go.

As for the format and quality thing, those posts were from AGES ago. Seriously, like... eons ago. They are not relevant now.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...