Hemophiliac

The soundcloud link seems to be not working. "This track was not found"

What's the source? The instruments sound fine together, but very basic.

[This is an automatically generated message] I've reviewed your remix and have returned it to Work-in-Progress status, indicating that I think there are some things you still need to work on. After you work on your track and feel that it's ready for submission to OCR, please change the prefix back to Ready for Review and someone will review it again. Good luck!

Evaluation: First off, let me apologize in taking so much time to get back. I really wanted to familiarize myself with the source as best as I could, because I have not heard it before. To me, this is a tough source to work with because there's not much going on melodically for the listener to hook onto. 0:14 breakbeats over the original bass synth + chord stab pattern (0:00-0:21 in the source). Feels like a loop that is used here rather than new part writing. Structurally very much the same as the source so far. 1:57 bigger hits come in as well as more low end and a lot of mud is added to the track. Before 1:57, it was fine and the bass wasn't taking up too much space. 4:09-4:38 that was a good decision to drop the beat here and let our ears have a rest. When it does come back at 4:38 we get more of the same rhythm pattern. More variation!! 4:38 when the higher synth comes in I feel like it's supposed to carry a lot of weight and signal a more climatic part of the song, but it doesn't feel as impactful as it seems it should be. You do add and subtract the layers at good points in the song. Just when I'm starting to get tired of hearing the same thing it changes, good job there. To me this sounds more like the traditional usage of the word remix, where the levels are changed on an existing track. Looking for arrangement and creative additions here. Things like changing the genre, chord progression, bass pattern, and adding solos (and more) could all work in making a track your own. Overall there needs to be more significant changes to the feel of the track to make it more distinguishable and your own thing. Right now the style is very close to the source, and needs something to make it more distinguishable as yours. Also look at the low end muddiness and see if that could be cleaned up.

Thank you very much. Now, of those which 1 track would you like me to evaluate and which source is it from the OST?

Could you please give me more information on what i'm looking at here? The OST you posted shows 16 sources, and your arrangement is one long (57 minute!! ?) audio track. Are there multiple sources used? Would it be possible to get a source breakdown?

[This is an automatically generated message] I've reviewed your remix and have returned it to Work-in-Progress status, indicating that I think there are some things you still need to work on. After you work on your track and feel that it's ready for submission to OCR, please change the prefix back to Ready for Review and someone will review it again. Good luck!

Evaluation: The very first thing I'm noticing is a lot of attenuation by a limiter/compressor on the peaks, as well as distortion. I think you should reduce the volume of everything and slowly bring them back up until the loudest point of the track isn't getting reduced by the limiter/compressor. The the low end has a lot of presence and (I think) the kick and/or bass could probably reduce some of the 150-200Hz range to make more space for the rest of the parts with an EQ. I really like the Vangelis-esque vibe you have going on, very cool. Shinra could play an analog to the Tyrell Corporation from Blade Runner. I'm just a sucker for 80s styled anything. Aside from the arp, I'm not hearing any reference to Memories of Green. Unless it's in the muted sax that starts at 3:24, I'm not catching any. 2:14 Trumpet works well for me as a nice transition, would be cool to hear more of the trumpet after that in a quieter section. I do like the sound of the sax (3:24), and it's usage; but it's buried in the mix and difficult to really hear what it's doing. You'll want to bring that out more and reduce the stuff around it so it has space to be present. That's even if it's supposed to be a background element. While not the worst as is, the drums could use more variation in their patterns.

[This is an automatically generated message] I've reviewed your remix and have returned it to Work-in-Progress status, indicating that I think there are some things you still need to work on. After you work on your track and feel that it's ready for submission to OCR, please change the prefix back to Ready for Review and someone will review it again. Good luck!

Evaluation: So I'm assuming the export error also cut something off at the beginning because it feels like it comes in halfway through a note of something. 1:00-1:38 really needs a melodic variation to separate it from being a direct repeat of 0:12-0:41. 1:39 Transition is abrupt and feels like it needs another two beats before transition made to the bridge. If i'm counting right, this is a measure of 2/4 and the rest of the piece is 4/4. I suggest just keeping the time as 4/4 and add two beats to that measure and it should help make the transition less awkward and sudden. It is the right time to bridge to the next section, but it's just cut short. I do like the 1:58 transition back to the head. In terms of production, I'm barely hearing the kick in much of the mix and sometimes not at all. Also feeling an imbalance in the stereo field, more on the right then the left. Double tracked guitars should be left and write more then the other stuff. Other stuff should be much closer to center. Reverb on the sax feels like a lot more then the rest of the parts in the track, definitely want to get closer to the other parts so it doesn't stand out with so much verb. 2:29-2:32 a couple notes in that phrase (on sax) not gelling with me.

Posted on discord for my claim.

Really enjoy the textures created on this one. Each time you return to the beginning of the loop, I like that you are making it feel like you're increasing the fullness or intensity in some way. Just be careful that it doesn't get too big on each return, I kept thinking you might get some artifacts of compression or clipping in those spots because it gets much louder and fuller. Consider adding some modulation to the pads ie automating a filter sweep or using an LFO to control some of the parameters of the synth to add more movement to the instrument. As far as the arrangement goes, it's structurally very close to the source tune. Next time, consider adding a bit more of yourself to the track. Maybe it could be a new original countermelody or new original section of the song. Maybe it could be a variation in the rhythm of the melody? Try something and see what happens, something magical could come from it!

[This is an automatically generated message] I've reviewed your remix and have returned it to Work-in-Progress status, indicating that I think there are some things you still need to work on. After you work on your track and feel that it's ready for submission to OCR, please change the prefix back to Ready for Review and someone will review it again. Good luck!

Evaluation: Non-music related comment: Nice video used for the track, very cool. Very cool take on the track and I hear a lot of potential. Percussion and bass could use compression to bring them up in the mix. They feel like they should be the driving focus of the track and right now they are pushed back. Also on the percussion, definitely could benefit for a lot of variation in the patterns; especially the high hats. The need for variation should be overemphasized because it's such a repetitive source. I strongly recommend that. 2:10 is the kind of stuff I expect to hear from your work lately. Nice transistion into this new B section. Great way to add your own flavor to the track here. 4:40 is the big build up you mentioned, the upper parts of the track work IMO. My suggestion there would be to look at how the percussion could also help build it up. A long drum fill? Maybe more unison hits, triplets, or syncopation? Bass attack is soft and could use some bite to it to help it punch, again; compression would help in this situation. Now, a question for you that we can definitely work on in the workshop on discord if you would like: Are you uncertain as to what needs compression or how to apply compression? Let me know, and i'll be happy to elaborate further.

Moved, no big deal. It's boarderline, could see it going in either really. Probably slightly more appropriate in "originals". Also welcome back, been a long time since we seen you around these parts Mashup sounds great, crazy how well they work together. Definitely get this to @Trenthian if possible.

Hello there, welcome to the forums. I've merged your threads into one, because we don't need multiple threads for this. One thread is perfectly fine. Also moved the posts to the "Post Your Original Music!" forum because that's more fitting for the topic. Please be aware of which forum you in before posting. Thank you

Welcome to the forums! Atmosphere on this is very nice. I can see why you're happy with that. The reason why you're saying it feels static is because your backing doesn't change through the whole piece. Variation in the drums and bass would do wonders for this. Adding a B section for a changeup in feel would take this to the next level. Adding 15 seconds of vinyl crackle at the end doesn't feel as satisfying as you think it might. How you handled the variation on the melody in the guitar is quite lovely and fits the vibe nicely. I suggest to give some variation in the drums and bass, and maybe consider a more definitive ending (pre-crackle) for a more solid ending. Great start, lots of potential here.

[This is an automatically generated message] I've reviewed your remix and have returned it to Work-in-Progress status, indicating that I think there are some things you still need to work on. After you work on your track and feel that it's ready for submission to OCR, please change the prefix back to Ready for Review and someone will review it again. Good luck!

Welcome to the forums! Evaluation: This has a nice mellow texture that I could put on and enjoy as a background track. The hang drum in the track is very nice choice for this. 1:44-1:57 is GREAT expansion on the melody. I usually don't hear people doing even this much interpretation at only 1 year into making music. Good job! Guitar is a nice choice to play the lead, and have it strum out some backing chords. The problem here is the realism of the guitar. The velocities and performance of the rhythm aren't varied and give a unrealistic feeling. Change up the velocities so they aren't identical to each other, and maybe move some of the notes around so they don't fall perfectly on each beat. Also it sounds like a few of the notes might be cut-off sooner than they were expecting to. The balance (volume/mixing on parts) could use some adjustment as some parts are louder than others. Drums could use more presence in the mix. Quick fade-out ending is weak and leaves something to be desired. In summary: Production and realism needs work, arrangement is promising (but could go further still), and ending is not ideal.

Gear does help some, but the skills and experience are more important. It takes time to experiment and improve. These skills don't happen overnight. Another key skill is using your ears critically. Knowing what works and what doesn't takes time to develop. Try things...if they don't work, oh well; move on and try something else. With all that being said, don't neglect the arrangement side of things either. Both are equally important when it comes to putting together a track. We all have potential, and again; it just takes time to get there.

[This is an automatically generated message] I've reviewed your remix and have returned it to Work-in-Progress status, indicating that I think there are some things you still need to work on. After you work on your track and feel that it's ready for submission to OCR, please change the prefix back to Ready for Review and someone will review it again. Good luck!

Evaluation: Yeah, this is muddy and imbalanced. The bass is much too big and takes up most of the space, covering up the other parts too much. Balance amongst the parts should be worked on to bring more parity between them, let them work together and not fight with each other. After the introduction, the source melody should be brought out more too so that the listener does have a better grasp on what they are hearing. I'm not sure how I feel about the high synth that's noodling about on top of everything. It's definitely occupying the right space for it, the part just feels random and not adding much to propel the track forward. As a listener you definitely notice it going away at 2:42. Helped with fatigue. Structurally, there could be a break in the middle with a contrasting feel to help separate the track and give it more momentum to keep it moving forward. Book-ending the beginning and endings can work, and this could work better if the ending doesn't happen so suddenly. That's also aside the fade-out, it doesn't work very well. I suggest ending at 3:22 instead, that spot actually feels like it could be a more natural ending. What I like is the mellow feeling the interpretation has compared to the original. Slowing the tempo really helped to bring out more ideas and gives space for you to explore your own take.

Can you post the source please? That way I can check it out and see about getting you an evaluation.

Cool. The bass is mixed too loud. I kept thinking while listening, bari-sax would be really neat in this. Arrangement is strong. Really just needs better balancing amongst parts.

[This is an automatically generated message] I've reviewed your remix and have returned it to Work-in-Progress status, indicating that I think there are some things you still need to work on. After you work on your track and feel that it's ready for submission to OCR, please change the prefix back to Ready for Review and someone will review it again. Good luck!