Skrypnyk

your new setup lacks a SH-32 =<

don't use the zoom tool and use the zoom time at the top right of the window (just below the [x]).

I know! Spend the money on the most expensive piece of software out there. Even if you don't have enough money, save up till you do. That way, you will have the l33test piece of software money can buy! . . . . . Or, download the demos of said programs and see which one you like, then buy that one.

Yes, yes they have. Download a mix in the upper 1000 and compare it to one of the first 500. Now, I'm not sure if someone sent you the rejection letter, or if it was just automated, but I don't think they meant 'ALL' of those reasons are the reasons it wasn't accepted. However, I could be wrong. I don't know the original, so I can't compare, but the first 1:45 is verrry dull, minimal, basic, boring, simple, etc. etc. The next minute is a bit more exciting, but even then that's not saying much. You samples, regardless of what you used, sound very flat, very gamey (for lack of a better word). There's no strong features to them. Some mastering/processing of them to bring them out, and have them sound stronger could help. So yea, the jdgfgts are really anal about interpreting the mix into something different, while keeping the original recognizable, and having good samples are a must. (even if they cost 5, or 500 dollars, better to sound real then sequenced).

pan the notes to the left and right channel.

oh ok

Re-releasing!? You mean they've been digitally re-master, re-restored, features bonus material and has less suckage!?!? =D I like free shit..... >__>

I really appreciate zircon not giving the typical hemo answer and saying "OVERUSE DBLUE LULZ!!!~1". At least, for my mix...

This game sounds morally wrong....so I must contribute something. I would like a sample of the kind of music you'd like, the length you'd like it, the file type you want, etc. etc.

[/thread] k thxs

I've got good news and bad news. The good news: The Bad news: It's a remix from me.

oh wow, this has potential to be pretty groovy. There's just 99 problems with it =( I swear I'm hearing a sour note in the first 40 seconds of this, and really it doesn't even sound like the first 40 seconds is needed. I don't really have time to break the individual sections down, I will say that I like the idea of turning this into an electro-swing/groove mix (whether or not that was what you were going for), but the out ranges from going way too minimal and repetitive, to way too over the top and orchestral filled. I find that there's zero chorus, or a part where you can just bob your head with the groove. Oh, it has a lot of parts leading up to this epic, head-bobbing climax, but it just feels like it broke down into something else. Snares/claps/snaps and small open hats are your friends!

You're about 2 months too late =<

Feedback plz

I like using a compressor on the master track though ;___; Good Jorb though, a must have for newbie FL users.

I know Spectrasonic doesn't allow any automation (even with last tweaked parameter options). That I think is spectrasonics fault. I know Kontakt2, unless you enable something (render something something), it'll be a bitch to use. Dunno if that's FL's fault or NI's. and, I know various mda plugins are messed up to shit. (Degrade, Detune, etc). I think that's mda's fault.

Needs more jdgfgts write ups IMHO.

Yay for wiki! Download VST, install in VST folder (wherever/whatever it may be), Channel > Add One > More, quick refresh, click red VST, Add one > select recently installed VST, play.

Nope .

That's actually kinda cool. The drums are pretty =< though.

If you search the FL Forums (well...the old FL Forums anyways), someone made a patch for this specific problem and it works.

it is =<

So I have this fairly old file, I probably started it back in FL6, and everything in the file play as well as it did when i first started making the song. The only difference is now, it isn't rendering ANY audio. Zip. Zero. Mute. Nothing. I thought it would be an issue with one of the effects, so I turned them all off and rendered. Now, audio did render this time, but only to the left channel =| . I did the same with all of the instruments, and it only rendered to the same channel. So I'mma confused as to why this is happening, and hope someone else had this same problem and fixed it....and would share how to with me =>

I don't think they can get rid of the numbers in your screen name, but if you want a different name, send an e-mail to image-line asking for it. I know when I bought FLStudio, they used my moms name instead of mine as the screen name, one e-mail later, and it was changed.

this goes with almost any plugin that won't let you do what you're describing. (at least with FLStudio anyways...) Fiddle with the knob, then click on the plug on the top left corner of the VST window, scroll down to 'Last Tweaked Parameter', and click 'Create Automation Clip'. An auto clip will appear, and you can continue from there.