prophetik music

that was pretty entertaining.

hooray for fallout! i mean, cerrax!

you've already got a 'the o*' model on the shtyjdgbot panel. get creative! you don't have anyone with their real name on there. vote for xjesse!

try restarting. it'll free up some of the crap that gets locked in during the normal course of working on a system. oh, you need a computer...?

no single application can load more than 2 gigs of ram into itself. it's gotta outsource it, similar to chrome's tab=process style. the errors start around 1800 megs, in my experience. learned that one the other day when my fl was erroring out. there's a workaround hack that'll expand it to 3 gigs but you risk bricking your windows installation if you dick it up.

and with that, the main body of this project is done. 63 pages or so. editing time! sengin, where are you...?' edit: quintuple post, haha!

happy bday, sgx. i think bladiator doesn't age, he just grows taller and bigger like koloss or something. but i haven't seen his skin rip yet, and he's not blue, so the spikes are in a different spot.

nice wip, man.

oh, great. then go ahead!

lol, but you probably used reverb on the vocals.

fine with me. not like i couldn't play anything that you put in front of me. i'm fairly certain that fx are frowned upon since they're from a licensed source. pm a judge, they're not doing anything else.

what iwe already did that all those years ago?

IH-mo-jen or ih-MOH-jen?

so why hasn't the 'currently' page been updated recently? can't anyone do that? you should see who updates more often. it could be a contest. a contest that actually means something to the faithful here at ocr!

how do you say her name, anyways? ee-moh-jean?

overcoat cuts right to the heart of the issue. spidey can't even hack his wrists open because his web will seal it shut! ultimate angst! edit: aw, don't pick on short-bus. you're only picking on him because you've been reading comic books since you were five, so people who don't trigger your idiot filter.

try a ii instead of a IV, and i think you'll find it fits way better. the minor V works really well in this song because it's the equivalent of doing a i-V-I progression - a picardy third, if you will. for what it's worth, i don't think it's really a minor V chord, i think it's a ii sus chord with the sus in the bass. there really isn't a classical way to write that because it'd break so damn many rules, but it sounds cool - it's popular in modern music only, you'd never see it in traditional writing. for a guitarist, it'd look like this: B C#sus/F# C#m F#. B D# F# F# C# F# G# C# E G# C# (might be a seven in there, i can't quite hear it) F# A# C# F#

i'm fine with that as long as it doesn't extend into, like, kenny g-style smooth jazz, or some stupid shit like that. gotta stick with our vibe here.

i wasn't talking specific to quads, i was talking in general. yeah, clock speeds are the same, but look at the timings on a chip. for some mid-level ddr2 ram, 5-5-5-15 is a standard timing - 15 clocks to close one row, read the next one, and prep the next row! no wonder there's such a big gap.

quads increase the processing performance in applications that are built for them specifically. however, the difference between a single core and a dual core in any application is absolutely enormous - the difference for a quad is negligible. there are a lot of multi-threading-capable applications that say that they're good with quads, but that's just marketing crap. in reality, the quad is still shits and giggles until the majority of the programming market is optimized for it [note - THIS INCLUDES FL STUDIO, REASON, AND MOST OTHER MAJOR DAWS AVAILABLE]. hell, vista isn't even optimized for it, and there still hasn't been word as to whether w7 is. even some of the top games out aren't really built for more than a dual-core, and some not even that - far cry 2 was the first game i ever played that accessed more than one core for processing gameplay. edit: i missed the multi-core thing phill mentioned. there's a reason we haven't seen anything more than that 6-core server cpu that intel put out at the end of last year. based on extreme multi-core tests, more than 8 might actually *decrease* the performance over a system with 4, 6, or 8 due to the simple fact that they don't have buses capable of handling that kind of bandwidth. moore's law in its virginal form applies here (i think it's moore's law, i don't remember off the top of my head), too - memory simply isn't expanding fast enough for cpu demands.

go look at their site and see if you can figure out what the hell is going on. they can't, so they might appreciate the help.

yeah, svchost does for general services (like networking and dns client) what rundll32 is for dll files (like audio and video drivers). power drain doesn't solve anything that might cause this - it's for whenever your mobo is like half-bricked or something. i don't know why they'd suggest that. maybe it's just cause it's an eMachines computer =)

well, the reason that it doesn't work well in multitasking is exactly that. dualcores make for a sizeable different in performance regardless of what you're doing. now quad cores, on the other hand...

i think just no one cares enough. it's been what, 11 years?

or you could keep it bumped yourself.