DCT Posted March 27, 2009 Posted March 27, 2009 Not a bad idea, Ad. I'll see what I can do. Why couldn't you think of that, Larry? Oh, how you disappoint me... -D Quote
Liontamer Posted March 27, 2009 Author Posted March 27, 2009 Why couldn't you think of that, Larry? Oh, how you disappoint me...-D Well honestly, it's not really anyone's business why something's not posted yet. I'm just planning to separate out the conditional YESs from the ones that are ready to go. Quote
Doulifée Posted March 28, 2009 Posted March 28, 2009 All the judge are DJP. Now you know why it take so much time for your mix to pass the panel. Quote
Rozovian Posted April 2, 2009 Posted April 2, 2009 +1 Nice Work Point for the improved Currently post. "Last edited by Palpable; Today at 05:56 PM.. Reason: Update queue" +1 to either or both Larry and Vinnie, then. July '08? Seriously? Quote
prophetik music Posted April 2, 2009 Posted April 2, 2009 i'm more scared about the to be posted queue. there's still tracks there from 07, which is a long time ago. Quote
OceansAndrew Posted April 2, 2009 Posted April 2, 2009 i'm more scared about the to be posted queue. there's still tracks there from 07, which is a long time ago. i see what you did there. Quote
Palpable Posted April 2, 2009 Posted April 2, 2009 We figured adding dates to the queue was good for giving us some more accountibility. I believe that Marathon/Halo mix actually isn't that old, but was subbed to us in July, then revoked, then a new version was sent later. Quote
Eino Keskitalo Posted April 2, 2009 Posted April 2, 2009 Yeah, good update. I like to look at the judging process list (for whatever reason), and now I feel like more informed n stuff. --Eino Quote
avaris Posted April 2, 2009 Posted April 2, 2009 Looks great dudes! Thank you for taking the time to do this. Quote
prophetik music Posted April 2, 2009 Posted April 2, 2009 definitely nice to be able to see dates. Quote
Rozovian Posted July 1, 2009 Posted July 1, 2009 Someone added Sky Diver, Inside Her to the recently rejected list without moving the decision. Oh wait it's "ASK a judge"... In the form of a question: Someone added Sky Diver, Inside Her to the recently rejected list without moving the decision, yes? Quote
DarkeSword Posted July 1, 2009 Posted July 1, 2009 http://www.ocremix.org/forums/search.php?searchid=1418420 No? Quote
Palpable Posted July 1, 2009 Posted July 1, 2009 Someone added Sky Diver, Inside Her to the recently rejected list without moving the decision. Oh wait it's "ASK a judge"... In the form of a question: Someone added Sky Diver, Inside Her to the recently rejected list without moving the decision, yes? The last vote was a while ago, so it showed up several pages behind. Next time we do that, I'll try to bump the thread so it shows up more recently. Quote
Thin Crust Posted July 1, 2009 Posted July 1, 2009 Two questions, and they will seem pretty strange. I saw someone on the wip boards making an arrangement of the theme they heard on an FFXIII trailer about a year ago. Would you guys YES something before the game even came out? And just for kicks, what would you say about Quote
anosou Posted July 1, 2009 Posted July 1, 2009 I saw someone on the wip boards making an arrangement of the theme they heard on an FFXIII trailer about a year ago. Would you guys YES something before the game even came out? Probably, yes. However if it turns out it isn't in the game when that comes out we'd remove it. Quote
Palpable Posted July 1, 2009 Posted July 1, 2009 We got a Mirror's Edge sub of "Still Alive" (the other one) before the game came out, but after it was known that the song would be in the game, so yeah upcoming games are ok. We'd just want to be sure the song will actually be in the game before we pass it, and not just used as trailer music. Quote
big giant circles Posted July 2, 2009 Posted July 2, 2009 For anyone *cough*Brad*cough* that complains that judging surely can't take up very much time, I have just spent the past hour and 45 minutes voting on TWO mixes. Some of this crap is just complicated. Even with my newfound voting leniency. I'm not complaining, I just thought I'd throw that out there to address anyone who thinks that voting is something that can't take more than 10-15 minutes. Quote
Eino Keskitalo Posted July 3, 2009 Posted July 3, 2009 Yeah, I find commenting on WIPs etc to take a good amount of time, especially if there's something bothering me and I'm trying to figure it out. --Eino Quote
JasonP27 Posted July 3, 2009 Posted July 3, 2009 After reading all 34 pages of this thread, I just have one question for the judges. Say a submission is only OK in production (EQ etc), and the instruments used could be a little better, but the song is very good musically and very creative. Is it possible for a song like this to still get a YES? Would it be more likely to get a NO (RESUBMIT) than a song with opposite problems? (i.e. good producing, great instruments, lacking musically) OK, that was two questions. Quote
Palpable Posted July 3, 2009 Posted July 3, 2009 After reading all 34 pages of this thread, I just have one question for the judges.Say a submission is only OK in production (EQ etc), and the instruments used could be a little better, but the song is very good musically and very creative. Is it possible for a song like this to still get a YES? Would it be more likely to get a NO (RESUBMIT) than a song with opposite problems? (i.e. good producing, great instruments, lacking musically) OK, that was two questions. 1. Sure. We just passed a song like this. 2. Can't give you a blanket answer like that, it really depends on how good the producing or arrangement is. One can compensate for the other, but only to a certain extent. I will say we don't get that many subs with great production that are lacking musically (it's rare to see someone who can produce well but doesn't have a melodic ear), but often we get great-sounding subs that are too liberal or conservative with the source material. Quote
LuketheXjesse Posted July 3, 2009 Posted July 3, 2009 Say a submission is only OK in production (EQ etc), and the instruments used could be a little better, but the song is very good musically and very creative. Is it possible for a song like this to still get a YES? http://www.ocremix.org/remix/OCR01345/ This is one of the very best remixes in the community, to boot. Quote
JasonP27 Posted July 4, 2009 Posted July 4, 2009 thank you for you quick reply and for the example link Quote
KyleJCrb Posted July 4, 2009 Posted July 4, 2009 http://www.ocremix.org/remix/OCR01345/This is one of the very best remixes in the community, to boot. Are you kidding? The production is a little rough on it, but Ninjascape is not a good example of what JasonP27 is asking about. These are, though: http://www.ocremix.org/remix/OCR01032/ and http://www.ocremix.org/remix/OCR01482/ Quote
Hemophiliac Posted July 4, 2009 Posted July 4, 2009 http://www.ocremix.org/remix/OCR01314/ and http://www.ocremix.org/remix/OCR01141/ these two come to mind on this topic, not great sounding production at all...excellent arrangement and very musical sequencing. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.